Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: finite element analyses with a rat model

被引:46
|
作者
Loboa, EG
Fang, TD
Parker, DW
Warren, SM
Fong, KD
Longaker, MT
Carter, DR
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Engn Mech, Biomech Engn Div, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
mechanobiology; mandibular distraction osteogenesis; finite element analysis; computed tomography; mesenchymal tissue differentiation;
D O I
10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses were performed to characterize the local mechanical environment created within the tissue regenerate during mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a rat model. Finite element models were created from three-dimensional computed tomography image data of rat hemi-mandibles at four different time points during an optimal distraction osteogenesis protocol (i.e., most successful protocol for bone formation): end latency (post-operative day (POD) 5), distraction day 2 (POD 7), distraction day 5 (POD 10), and distraction day 8 (POD 13). A 0.25 mm distraction was simulated and the resulting hydrostatic stresses and maximum principal tensile strains were determined within the tissue regenerate. When compared to previous histological findings, finite element analyses showed that tensile strains up to 13% corresponded to regions of new bone formation and regions of periosteal hydrostatic pressure with magnitudes less than 17 kPa corresponded to locations of cartilage formation. Tensile strains within the center of the gap were much higher, leading us to conclude that tissue damage would occur there if the tissue was not compliant enough to withstand such high strains, and that this damage would trigger formation of new mesenchymal tissue. These data were consistent with histological evidence showing mesenchymal tissue present in the center of the gap throughout distraction. Finite element analyses performed at different time points during distraction were instrumental in determining the changes in hydrostatic stress and tensile strain fields throughout distraction, providing a mechanical environment rationale for the different levels of bone formation in end latency, and distraction day 2, 5, and 8 specimens. (c) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: experimental analyses with a rat model
    Loboa, EG
    Fang, TD
    Warren, SM
    Lindsey, DP
    Fong, KD
    Longaker, MT
    Carter, DR
    [J]. BONE, 2004, 34 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [2] A rat model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Ignelzi, MA
    Buchman, SR
    Goldstein, SA
    Radu, C
    Wilensky, JS
    Rosenthal, AH
    [J]. DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 1998, 34 : 141 - 152
  • [3] Stress Distribution on the Mandibular Condyle and the Distraction Area in Distraction Osteogenesis by Finite Element Analysis
    Li, Peng
    Long, Jie
    Tang, Wei
    Li, Jia
    Liang, Rui
    Tian, Dong Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (03) : 1031 - 1037
  • [4] A new rat model for the study of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Rowe, NM
    Mehrara, BJ
    Mackool, RJ
    Gittes, GK
    McCarthy, JG
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 7, 1997, : 337 - 339
  • [5] Guided tissue regeneration enhances osteogenesis in a rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, R
    Song, H
    Fong, K
    Warren, S
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (03) : S49 - S49
  • [6] Biomechanical evaluation of mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis by using the finite element method
    Basciftci, FA
    Korkmaz, HS
    Iseri, H
    Malkoç, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 125 (06) : 706 - 715
  • [7] An experimental model of distraction osteogenesis in rat mandibular alveolar bone
    Pujadas Bigi, M. M.
    Kokubu, S.
    Lewicki, M.
    Nenda, M. M.
    Ubios, A. M.
    Mandalunis, P. M.
    [J]. BONE, 2011, 48 (06) : S287 - S287
  • [8] A mathematical model for mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Schendel, SA
    Heegaard, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 7 (06) : 465 - 468
  • [9] A mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, RP
    Song, HM
    Thomas, R
    Fong, KD
    Aalami, OO
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 397 - 398
  • [10] Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: A finite element study
    Boccaccio, Antonio
    Lamberti, Luciano
    Pappalettere, Carmine
    Cozzani, Mauro
    Siciliani, Giuseppe
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (02) : 260 - 269