The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Cindil, Emetullah [1 ]
Oner, Yusuf [1 ]
Sendur, Halit Nahit [1 ]
Ozdemir, Hakan [1 ]
Gazel, Eymen [2 ]
Tunc, Lutfi [2 ]
Cerit, Mahi Nur [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Gleason score; Magnetic resonance imaging; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; GLEASON SCORE; COEFFICIENT VALUE; AGGRESSIVENESS; BIOPSY; ADC; DIFFERENTIATION; DIAGNOSIS; VALUES; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.carj.2019.07.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: To establish the diagnostic performance of the parameters obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3T in discriminating between non-clinically significant prostate cancers (ncsPCa, Gleason score [GS] < 7) and clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa, GS >= 7) in the peripheral zone. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six male patients with peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) who had undergone 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan prior to biopsy were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively. The GS was obtained by both standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy and then confirmed by prostatectomy, if available. For each confirmed tumour focus, DCE-derived quantitative perfusion metrics (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, initial area under the curve [AUC]), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and normalized versions of quantitative metrics were measured and correlated with the GS. Results: Ktrans had the highest diagnostic accuracy value of 82% among the DCE-MRI parameters (AUC 0.90), and ADC had the strongest diagnostic accuracy value of 87% among the overall parameters (AUC 0.92). The combination of ADC and Ktrans have higher diagnostic performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.98 (sensitivity 0.94; specificity 0.89; accuracy 0.92) compared to the individual evaluation of each parameter alone,The GS showed strong negative correlations with ADC (r = -0.72) and normalized ADC (r = -0.69) as well as a significant positive correlation with Ktrans (r = 0.69). Conclusion: The combination of Ktrans and ADC and their normalized versions may help differentiate between ncsPCa from csPCa in the peripheral zone.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 451
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The utility of ADC parameters in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer by 3.0-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Kus, Aylin Altan
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 86 : E262 - E268
  • [2] Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Koh, Dow-Mu
    Padhani, Anwar
    van As, Nicholas
    Sohaib, S. Aslam
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1716 - 1722
  • [3] DETECTING AND LOCALIZING PROSTATE CANCER FROM DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Reda, Islam
    Ghazal, Mohammed
    Shalaby, Ahmed
    Elmogy, Mohammed
    Aboulfotouh, Ahmed
    Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed
    El-Melegy, Moumen
    Khalil, Ashraf
    Keynton, Robert
    El-Baz, Ayman
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2019, : 1405 - 1409
  • [4] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Significant Prostate Cancer with High Probability
    Bains, Lauren J.
    Studer, Urs E.
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Triantafyllou, Maria
    Fleischmann, Achim
    Thoenyt, Harriet C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03): : 737 - 742
  • [5] Meta-analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Prostate Cancer
    Jin, Guanqiao
    Su, Dan Ke
    Luo, Ning Bin
    Liu, Li Dong
    Zhu, Xuna
    Huang, Xiang Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (02) : 195 - 202
  • [6] Perfusion effects in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer
    Nordenstam, J.
    Rothenberger, D.
    Madoff, R.
    Wikstrom, J.
    Jessurun, J.
    Garwood, M.
    Mellgren, A.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 745 - 745
  • [7] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer evaluation
    Rinaldi, D.
    Fiocchi, F.
    Ligabue, G.
    Bianchi, G.
    Torricelli, P.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (08): : 1429 - 1440
  • [8] Usefulness of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhu, Jiong
    Ye, Yong-Quan
    Hu, Jiani
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 1215 - 1224
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Comparison With Sextant Biopsy
    Yamamura, Jin
    Salomon, Georg
    Buchert, Ralph
    Hohenstein, Arne
    Graessner, Joachim
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Adam, Gerhard
    Wedegaertner, Ulrike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and ischemic stroke
    Li, FH
    Fisher, M
    [J]. DRUGS OF TODAY, 1996, 32 (08) : 615 - 627