Effect of the Substrate to Inoculum Ratios on the Kinetics of Biogas Production during the Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste

被引:40
|
作者
Khadka, Aakash [1 ,2 ]
Parajuli, Anmol [1 ]
Dangol, Sheila [3 ]
Thapa, Bijay [3 ,4 ]
Sapkota, Lokesh [2 ,3 ]
Carmona-Martinez, Alessandro A. [5 ]
Ghimire, Anish [1 ]
机构
[1] Kathmandu Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Resource Recovery Res Grp Re3G, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal
[2] Soil Water & Air Testing Labs Pvt Ltd, GPO 25752, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
[3] Nawa Paila, Sisir Marg 11, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
[4] Kathmandu Univ, Sch Engn, EnergizeNepal, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal
[5] Univ Zaragoza, CIRCE Fdn, CIRCE Res Ctr Energy Resources & Consumpt, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Ave Ranillas 3D,1a Planta, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
关键词
food waste; biogas; substrate to inoculum ratio; kinetic modeling; Gompertz model; volatile solids; energy recovery; first-order kinetics; MODE PROCESS STABILITY; METHANE PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; KITCHEN WASTE; CO-DIGESTION; BATCH; PRETREATMENT; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH; PH;
D O I
10.3390/en15030834
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the effects of the varying substrate to inoculum ratios (S:I) of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (volatile solids/VS basis) on the kinetics of biogas production during batch mesophilic (35 +/- 1 degrees C) anaerobic digestion (AD) of simulated food waste (FW), using anaerobic digestate as the inoculum. Kinetic parameters during biogas production (scrubbed with NaOH solution) are predicted by the first-order and the modified Gompertz model. The observed average specific biogas yields are in descending order corresponding to the S:I ratios 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5, and 0.5, respectively, and the significant effect of the S:I ratio was observed. The tests with the S:I of 1 have the maximum average biogas production rates of 88.56 NmL/gVS.d, whereas tests with the S:I of 6 exhibited the lowest production rates (24.61 NmL/gVS.d). The maximum biogas yields, predicted by the first order and the modified Gompertz model, are 668.65 NmL/gVS (experimental 674.40 +/- 29.10 NmL/gVS) and 653.17 NmL/gVS, respectively. The modified Gompertz model has been proven to be suitable in predicting biogas production from FW. VS removal efficiency is greater in higher S:I ratios, with a maximum of 78.80 % at the S:I ratio of 6, supported by the longer incubation time. Moreover, a significant effect of the S:I ratio is seen on kinetics and energy recovery from the AD of FW.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of different inoculum and substrate inoculum ratios on biogas yield for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of solid waste
    Sharma, Kapil Dev
    Jain, Siddharth
    [J]. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2023, 25 (10): : 15 - 24
  • [2] Effect of substrate pretreatment on biogas production through anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Deepanraj, B.
    Sivasubramanian, V.
    Jayaraj, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (42) : 26522 - 26528
  • [3] Influence of feed/inoculum ratios and waste cooking oil content on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Li, Yangyang
    Jin, Yiying
    Borrion, Aiduan
    Li, Jinhui
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 73 : 156 - 164
  • [4] Influence of inoculums/substrate ratios (ISRs) on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste in batch mode: Process stability and biogas production
    Slimane, Kalloum
    Fathya, Salem
    Assia, Kouki
    Hamza, Mokaddem
    [J]. TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY (TMREES14 - EUMISD), 2014, 50 : 57 - 63
  • [5] Effect of the Inoculum-to-Substrate Ratio on Putative Pathogens and Microbial Kinetics during the Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Simulated Food Waste
    Otite, Saanu Victoria
    Gandhi, Bhushan P.
    Agyabeng Fofie, Esther
    Lag-Brotons, Alfonso Jose
    Ezemonye, Lawrence I.
    Martin, Alastair D.
    Pickup, Roger W.
    Semple, Kirk T.
    [J]. MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [6] Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production
    Zhang, Cunsheng
    Su, Haijia
    Baeyens, Jan
    Tan, Tianwei
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 : 383 - 392
  • [7] Batch anaerobic digestion of simulated Bangladeshi food waste: methane production at different inoculum-to-substrate ratios and kinetic analysis
    Tasnim, Tanziha
    Behera, Shishir Kumar
    Zafar, Mohd
    Park, Hung-Suck
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2016, 9 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [8] Anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and septage: Effect of substrate and inoculum on biogas production
    Bella, K.
    Rao, P. Venkateswara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 308
  • [9] Effects of Different Materials on Biogas Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste
    Dompara, Iliana
    Maragkaki, Angeliki
    Papastefanakis, Nikolaos
    Floraki, Christina
    Vernardou, Dimitra
    Manios, Thrassyvoulos
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [10] Effect of different livestock dungs as inoculum on food waste anaerobic digestion and its kinetics
    Dhamodharan, Kondusamy
    Kumar, Vikas
    Kalamdhad, Ajay S.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 180 : 237 - 241