Emotion understanding, theory of mind, and prosocial orientation: Relations over time in early childhood

被引:98
|
作者
Eggum, Natalie D. [1 ]
Eisenberg, Nancy [2 ]
Kao, Karen [2 ]
Spinrad, Tracy L. [1 ]
Bolnick, Rebecca [2 ]
Hofer, Claire [2 ]
Kupfer, Anne S. [2 ]
Fabricius, William V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Social & Family Dynam, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY | 2011年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
emotion understanding; theory of mind; prosocial behavior; empathy; sympathy; FALSE BELIEF; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; CHILDRENS SYMPATHY; EFFORTFUL CONTROL; SOCIAL COGNITION; BEHAVIOR; PRESCHOOLERS; EMPATHY;
D O I
10.1080/17439760.2010.536776
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Data were collected when children were 42, 54, and 72 months of age (Ns = 210, 191, and 172 for T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Children's emotion understanding (EU) and theory of mind (ToM) were examined as predictors of children's prosocial orientation within and across time. EU positively related to children's sympathy across 2.5 years, and T1 EU positively related to parent-reported prosocial orientation concurrently and across 1 year (T2). T2 ToM positively related to parents' reports of sympathy and prosocial orientation concurrently and 18 months later (T3); in contrast, T3 ToM did not relate to sympathy or prosocial orientation. T2 ToM accounted for marginally significant variance (p < 0.058) in T3 mother-reported prosocial orientation over and above that accounted for by T2 prosocial orientation. Fostering the development of EU and ToM may contribute to children's prosocial orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 16
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood
    Lane, Jonathan D.
    Wellman, Henry M.
    Olson, Sheryl L.
    LaBounty, Jennifer
    Kerr, David C. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) : 871 - 889
  • [2] Relations Between the Development of Teaching and Theory of Mind in Early Childhood
    Ziv, Margalit
    Solomon, Ayelet
    Strauss, Sidney
    Frye, Douglas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 17 (02) : 264 - 284
  • [3] PRODUCING AND UNDERSTANDING PROSOCIAL ACTIONS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD
    Paulus, Markus
    Moore, Chris
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND BEHAVIOR, VOL 42, 2012, 42 : 271 - 305
  • [4] Developing an understanding of others' emotional states: Relations among affective theory of mind and empathy measures in early childhood
    Gallant, Caitlyn M. M.
    Lavis, Lydia
    Mahy, Caitlin E. V.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 38 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [5] The Relations of Ego-Resiliency and Emotion Socialization to the Development of Empathy and Prosocial Behavior Across Early Childhood
    Taylor, Zoe E.
    Eisenberg, Nancy
    Spinrad, Tracy L.
    Eggum, Natalie D.
    Sulik, Michael J.
    [J]. EMOTION, 2013, 13 (05) : 822 - 831
  • [6] Executive function and theory of mind as predictors of aggressive and prosocial behavior and peer acceptance in early childhood
    O'Toole, Sarah E.
    Monks, Claire P.
    Tsermentseli, Stella
    [J]. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 26 (04) : 907 - 920
  • [7] Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence
    Ebert, Susanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 191
  • [8] Understanding schemas and emotion in early childhood
    Huggins, Valerie
    [J]. PASTORAL CARE IN EDUCATION, 2010, 28 (02) : 155 - 156
  • [9] Prosocial behavior in toddlerhood and early childhood: Consistency across subtypes and over time
    Paz, Yael
    Davidov, Maayan
    Orlitsky, Tal
    Hayut, Mor
    Roth-Hanania, Ronit
    Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] The Relations among Theory of Mind, Behavioral Inhibition, and Peer Interactions in Early Childhood
    Suway, Jenna G.
    Degnan, Kathryn A.
    Sussman, Amy L.
    Fox, Nathan A.
    [J]. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 21 (02) : 331 - 342