Process measurement impact on the verification uncertainty

被引:2
|
作者
Bachmann, J [1 ]
Linares, JM [1 ]
Aranda, S [1 ]
Sprauel, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranee, IUT, Lab EA MS 2, F-13625 Aix En Provence, France
关键词
D O I
10.1142/9789812702647_0012
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Coordinate measuring machines are now widely used to qualify industrial pieces. Nevertheless, the actual CMM software's usually restrict to the determination of mean values. This is the case for both the characterization of individual surfaces and for the determination of geometrical errors. However, in accordance with quality standards, the uncertainty of each measurement should also be defined. At last CIRP seminar, a new non linear least squares method has been proposed for that purpose to define the error bars of the parameters estimated for each measured surface. These values are deduced from the gap between the measured coordinates and the associated optimized surface. Our new presentation now extends to the propagation of such uncertainties to the determination of ISO 1101 tolerances (dimensions and geometrical errors). To illustrate this approach, a specification was inspected on a true real industrial piece, with respect to the ISO 1101 standard. For this industrial application, different measurement procedures were proposed and carried out. The uncertainties of the estimated geometrical errors were then evaluated, showing the influence of the experimental method onto the reliability of the measurement. This example thus demonstrates the need to optimize the inspection process. To conclude our presentation, different aspects of the inspection are finally discussed to improve the verification of ISO 1101 specifications.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Purity verification and measurement uncertainty
    Wong, Siu Kay
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2010, 15 (06) : 337 - 341
  • [2] Purity verification and measurement uncertainty
    Siu Kay Wong
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2010, 15 : 337 - 341
  • [3] The Impact of Measurement Uncertainty On the Dose Map Analysis of VMAT Verification Plans
    Sandhu, G.
    Kohli, K.
    Szpala, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2894 - 2894
  • [4] The impact of the measurement of uncertainty
    Mehr, S.
    Wong, M.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 39 (01) : 70 - 70
  • [5] Transistor Model Verification Including Measurement Uncertainty
    Williams, Dylan F.
    Chamberlin, Richard A.
    Zhao, Wei
    Cheron, Jerome
    Urteaga, Miguel E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2016, 64 (11) : 3927 - 3933
  • [6] Verification of Hybrid Automata Diagnosability With Measurement Uncertainty
    Deng, Yi
    D'Innocenzo, Alessandro
    Di Benedetto, Maria Domenica
    Di Gennaro, Stefano
    Julius, A. Agung
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2016, 61 (04) : 982 - 993
  • [7] Energy savings reporting and uncertainty in Measurement & Verification
    Akinsooto, O.
    de Canha, D.
    Pretorius, J. H. C.
    [J]. 2014 AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC), 2014,
  • [8] Estimating uncertainty of a measurement process
    Chang, Ning
    Lambert, Jim
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 9 - +
  • [9] Impact of Measurement Uncertainty on Modelling
    Schreurs, D.
    Liu, S.
    Avolio, G.
    Ocket, I.
    [J]. 2016 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVE, RADAR AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS (MIKON), 2016,
  • [10] Impact of the sampling process on the measurement uncertainty, a case study: physicochemical parameters in diesel
    Leite, Viviane de Jesus
    de Oliveira, Elcio Cruz
    Aucelio, Ricardo Queiroz
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2021, 26 (01) : 1 - 9