How Do Drugs Affect the Skeleton? Implications for Forensic Anthropology

被引:10
|
作者
Marquez-Grant, Nicholas [1 ]
Baldini, Elisa [1 ]
Jeynes, Victoria [2 ]
Biehler-Gomez, Lucie [3 ]
Aoukhiyad, Layla [4 ]
Passalacqua, Nicholas, V [5 ]
Giordano, Gaia [3 ]
Di Candia, Domenico [3 ]
Cattaneo, Cristina [3 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Forens Inst, Bedford MK43 0AL, England
[2] Cwm Taf Morgannwg Univ Hlth Board, Urgent Primary Care, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[4] Serv Salut Illes Balears, Palma De Mallorca 07003, Spain
[5] Western Carolina Univ, Dept Anthropol & Sociol, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
来源
BIOLOGY-BASEL | 2022年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
forensic anthropology; medication; drugs of abuse; biological profile; human identification; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; HORMONE ANALOG TREATMENT; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS; KNEE CARTILAGE VOLUME; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; METHAMPHETAMINE ABUSE; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; JAW OSTEONECROSIS;
D O I
10.3390/biology11040524
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly by assessing age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry and any unique identifying features. Whilst methods have been established to create this biological profile of the skeleton, these may be influenced by a number of factors. This paper, for the first time, provides an overview from a reading of the clinical and pharmacological literature to explore whether the intake of drugs can affect the skeleton and whether these may have implications for forensic anthropology casework. In effect, drugs such as tobacco, heroin, and prescription medications can alter bone mineral density, can increase the risk of fractures, destroy bone and changes to the dentition. By considering how drugs can affect the skeleton, forensic anthropologists can be aware of this when attempting to identify the deceased. Forensic anthropologists rely on a number of parameters when analyzing human skeletal remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry or population affinity, and any unique identifying features. During the examination of human remains, it is important to be aware that the skeletal features considered when applying anthropological methods may be influenced and modified by a number of factors, and particular to this article, prescription drugs (including medical and non-medical use) and other commonly used drugs. In view of this, this paper aims to review the medical, clinical and pharmacological literature to enable an assessment of those drug groups that as side effects have the potential to have an adverse effect on the skeleton, and explore whether or not they can influence the estimation of age-at-death, sex and other indicators of the biological profile. Moreover, it may be that the observation of certain alterations or inconsistencies in the skeleton may relate to the use of drugs or medication, and this in turn may help narrow down the list of missing persons to which a set of human remains could belong. The information gathered from the clinical and medical literature has been extracted with a forensic anthropological perspective and provides an awareness on how several drugs, such as opioids, cocaine, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, tobacco and others have notable effects on bone. Through different mechanisms, drugs can alter bone mineral density, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, increase the risk of fractures, osteonecrosis, and oral changes. Not much has been written on the influence of drugs on the skeleton from the forensic anthropological practitioner perspective; and this review, in spite of its limitations and the requirement of further research, aims to investigate the current knowledge of the possible effects of both prescription and recreational drugs on bones, contributing to providing a better awareness in forensic anthropological practice and assisting in the identification process of the deceased.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do drugs in semen affect the conceptus?
    Pak, Eunice
    Coulson, James
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 180 : 1367 - 1367
  • [2] HOW DO DRUGS AFFECT POTENCY IN ELDERLY WOMEN
    SLATER, S
    GERIATRICS, 1989, 44 (08) : 72 - 72
  • [3] HOW DO GLUTAMATERGIC DRUGS AFFECT COGNITIVE FUNCTION - COMMENTARY
    STECKLER, T
    SAHGAL, A
    BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 6 (5-6): : 475 - 477
  • [4] Novel Oncologic Drugs: What They Do and How They Affect Images
    Garcia Figueiras, Roberto
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Goh, Vicky J.
    Vilanova, Joan C.
    Baleato Gonzalez, Sandra
    Villalba Martin, Carmen
    Gomez Caamano, Antonio
    Bermudez Naveira, Anaberta
    Choyke, Peter L.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2011, 31 (07) : 2059 - 2091
  • [5] HOW DRUGS AFFECT DRUGS
    HAYES, AH
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1981, 13 (13) : 114 - &
  • [6] HOW DRUGS AFFECT DRUGS
    HAYES, AH
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1984, 16 (03) : 217 - &
  • [7] Histomorphometric analysis of the variability of the human skeleton: Forensic implications
    Cummaudo, Marco
    Raffone, Caterina
    Cappella, Annalisa
    Marquez-Grant, Nicholas
    Cattaneo, Cristina
    LEGAL MEDICINE, 2020, 45
  • [8] Histomorphological analysis of the variability of the human skeleton: forensic implications
    Marco Cummaudo
    Annalisa Cappella
    Miranda Biraghi
    Caterina Raffone
    Nicholas Màrquez-Grant
    Cristina Cattaneo
    International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2018, 132 : 1493 - 1503
  • [9] Histomorphological analysis of the variability of the human skeleton: forensic implications
    Cummaudo, Marco
    Cappella, Annalisa
    Biraghi, Miranda
    Raffone, Caterina
    Marquez-Grant, Nicholas
    Cattaneo, Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2018, 132 (05) : 1493 - 1503
  • [10] Comment I: Implications of the interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
    Sanabria Medina, Cesar
    INTERSECCIONES EN ANTROPOLOGIA, 2016, 17 (02): : 145 - 147