Natural variability or climate change? Stakeholder and citizen perceptions of extreme event attribution

被引:37
|
作者
Osaka, Shannon [1 ]
Bellamy, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Geog, Arthur Lewis Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Extreme event attribution; Climate change; Perception; California drought; Weather; Climate communication; CALIFORNIA DROUGHT; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; WEATHER EVENTS; UNCERTAINTY; ADAPTATION; EXPERIENCE; RISK; LIABILITY; SCIENCE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientists can now connect extreme weather events with climate change using a methodology known as "extreme event attribution", or EEA. The idea of connecting climate change and extreme weather has long been heralded as a panacea for communications, connecting the dangers of climate change to real-world, on-the-ground events. However, event attribution remains a nascent science, and attribution studies of the same event can sometimes produce divergent answers due to precise methodology used, variables examined, and the timescale selected for the event. The 2011-2017 California drought was assessed by 11 EEA studies which came to varying conclusions on its connection to climate change. This article uses the case study of the drought and a multi-methods approach to examine perceptions of EEA among key stakeholders and citizens. Twenty-five key informant interviews were conducted with different stakeholders: scientists performing EEA research, journalists, local and state-level policymakers, and non-governmental organization representatives. In addition, two focus groups with 20 California citizens were convened: one with environmentalists and another with agriculturalists. While climate change was viewed by many as a mild contributing factor to the California drought, many stakeholders had not heard of EEA or doubted that scientists could conclusively link the drought to anthropogenic climate change; those that were familiar with EEA felt that the science was generally uncertain. In the focus groups, presentation of divergent EEA results led participants to revert to pre-existing ideas about the drought-climate connection, or to question whether science had sufficiently advanced to analyze the event properly. These results indicate that while EEA continues to provoke interest and research in the scientific community, it is not currently utilized by many stakeholders, and may entrench the public in pre-existing views.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing public and scientific extreme event attribution to climate change
    Zanocco, Chad
    Mote, Philip
    Flora, June
    Boudet, Hilary
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2024, 177 (05)
  • [2] Ethics of Probabilistic Extreme Event Attribution in Climate Change Science: A Critique
    Olsson, Lennart
    Thoren, Henrik
    Harnesk, David
    Persson, Johannes
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [3] Stakeholder perceptions of event attribution in the loss and damage debate
    Parker, Hannah R.
    Boyd, Emily
    Cornforth, Rosalind J.
    James, Rachel
    Otto, Friederike E. L.
    Allen, Myles R.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2017, 17 (04) : 533 - 550
  • [4] Extreme weather experience and climate change risk perceptions: The roles of partisanship and climate change cause attribution
    Ai, Xin
    Han, Ziqiang
    Zhang, Qiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2024, 108
  • [5] Attribution of Extreme Events to Climate Change
    Otto, Friederike E. L.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2023, 48 : 813 - 828
  • [6] CLIMATE CHANGE Attribution of extreme weather
    Otto, Friederike E. L.
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2015, 8 (08) : 581 - 582
  • [7] On the Attribution of a Single Event to Climate Change
    Hansen, Gerrit
    Auffhammer, Maximilian
    Solow, Andrew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (22) : 8297 - 8301
  • [8] Event attribution and partisanship shape local discussion of climate change after extreme weather
    Hilary Boudet
    Leanne Giordono
    Chad Zanocco
    Hannah Satein
    Hannah Whitley
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10 : 69 - 76
  • [9] Event attribution and partisanship shape local discussion of climate change after extreme weather
    Boudet, Hilary
    Giordono, Leanne
    Zanocco, Chad
    Satein, Hannah
    Whitley, Hannah
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (01) : 69 - +
  • [10] Towards reliable extreme weather and climate event attribution
    Omar Bellprat
    Virginie Guemas
    Francisco Doblas-Reyes
    Markus G. Donat
    [J]. Nature Communications, 10