Submarine groundwater discharge in a subsiding coastal lowland: A 226Ra and 222Rn investigation in the Southern Venice lagoon

被引:17
|
作者
Gattacceca, Julie C. [1 ]
Mayer, Adriano [2 ]
Cucco, Andrea [3 ]
Claude, Christelle [1 ]
Radakovitch, Olivier [1 ]
Vallet-Coulomb, Christine [1 ]
Hamelin, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, CEREGE, UMR CNRS IRD CDF 6635, F-13545 Aix En Provence, France
[2] IDPA CNR, I-20131 Milan, Italy
[3] CNR IAMC, Oristano Unit, I-09072 Oristano, Italy
关键词
RADIUM ISOTOPES; RA ISOTOPES; SUBTERRANEAN ESTUARY; WATER DISCHARGE; RESIDENCE TIME; ZONE; SEDIMENTS; FLUXES; SEA; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.001
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Several recent studies have suggested that submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) occurs in the Venice lagoon with discharge rates on the same order or larger than the surface runoff, as demonstrated previously in several other coastal zones around the world. Here, the first set of Rn-222 data, along with new Ra-226 data are reported, in order to investigate the occurrence and magnitude of SGD specifically in the southern basin of the lagoon. The independent connection with the Adriatic Sea (at the Chioggia inlet), in addition to the relative isolation of the water body from the main lagoon, make this area an interesting case study. There is probably only minimal fresh groundwater flux to the lagoon because the surrounding aquifer is subsiding and mainly has a lower hydraulic head than seawater. The data show that the Ra and Rn activities are in slight excess in the lagoon compared to the open sea, with values on the same order as those observed in the northern and central basins. Taking into account the water exchange rate between the lagoon and adjacent seawater provided by previous hydrodynamic numerical modelling, it is shown that this excess cannot be supported at steady state by only riverine input and by diffusive release from the sediment interstitial water. High activities observed in groundwater samples collected from 16 piezometers tapping into the shallow aquifer over the coastal lowland substantiate that the excess radioactivity in the lagoon may indeed be due to the advection of groundwater directly into the lagoon bottom water through the sediment interface. However, the data show that the groundwater composition is extremely heterogeneous, with high Ra activities concentrated within a narrow coastal strip where the contact between fresh and saline water takes place, while Rn strongly decreases when approaching the lagoon shore across the 20 km coastal plain. Assuming that the average groundwater activities measured in the coastal strip are representative of the SGD composition, a SGD flux of 7.7 +/- 3.5 x 10(5) and 2.5 +/- 2 x 10(6) m(3)/d is calculated using a Ra-226 and Rn-222 budget, respectively, (i.e. about 1-3 times the surface runoff), substantially lower than in previous studies. The influence of all assumptions on SGD estimates (groundwater heterogeneity, diffusive sediment flux, one-box versus multi-boxes model calculations) is discussed, and a sensitivity analysis of the influence of imperfect exchange and mixing at the lagoon outlets that affects the lagoon composition is provided. Finally, the results confirm that the SGD flux, calculated with these assumptions, is largely (similar to 80%) composed of saline lagoon water circulating through the sediment under the lagoon margin, and that the fresh water discharge associated with SGD is at most a minor term in the lagoon hydrologic balance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 920
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of 222Rn and 226Ra to trace groundwater discharge into the Chesapeake Bay
    Hussain, N
    Church, TM
    Kim, G
    [J]. MARINE CHEMISTRY, 1999, 65 (1-2) : 127 - 134
  • [2] Field Evaluation of an Encapsulated 226Ra–222Rn Source
    N. K. Sethy
    Sarjan Singh
    V. N. Jha
    Gopal Verma
    S. K. Jha
    M. S. Kulkarni
    [J]. MAPAN, 2024, 39 : 131 - 137
  • [3] Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 228Ra, 222Rn and their health impact in the groundwater of Jordan
    Ahmad Hussein Alomari
    Muneer Aziz Saleh
    Suhairul Hashim
    Amal Alsayaheen
    Ismael Abdeldin
    [J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2019, 322 : 305 - 318
  • [4] Occurrence of 222Rn, 226Ra, 228Ra and U in groundwater in Fujian Province, China
    Zhuo, WH
    Iida, T
    Yang, XT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2001, 53 (01) : 111 - 120
  • [5] Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 228Ra, 222Rn and their health impact in the groundwater of Jordan
    Alomari, Ahmad Hussein
    Saleh, Muneer Aziz
    Hashim, Suhairul
    Alsayaheen, Amal
    Abdeldin, Ismael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2019, 322 (02) : 305 - 318
  • [6] 226Ra and 222Rn concentrations and doses in bottled waters in Spain
    Dueñas, C
    Fernández, MC
    Carretero, J
    Liger, E
    Cañete, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 1999, 45 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [7] Ion implantation of 226Ra for a primary 222Rn emanation standard
    Mertes, Florian
    Kneip, Nina
    Heinke, Reinhard
    Kieck, Tom
    Studer, Dominik
    Weber, Felix
    Roettger, Stefan
    Roettger, Annette
    Wendt, Klaus
    Walther, Clemens
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2022, 181
  • [8] Submarine groundwater discharge data at meter scale (223Ra, 224Ra, 226Ra, 228Ra and 222Rn) in Indian River Bay (Delaware, US)
    Duque, Carlos
    Knee, Karen L.
    Russoniello, Christopher J.
    Sherif, Mahmoud
    Abu Risha, Usama A.
    Sturchio, Neil C.
    Michael, Holly A.
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2019, 27
  • [9] Doses from 222Rn, 226Ra, and 228Ra in groundwater from Guarani aquifer, South America
    Bonotto, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2004, 76 (03) : 319 - 335
  • [10] New perspectives on the use of 224Ra/228Ra and 222Rn/226Ra activity ratios in groundwater studies
    Diego-Feliu, M.
    Rodellas, V
    Saaltink, M. W.
    Alorda-Kleinglass, A.
    Goyetche, T.
    Martinez-Perez, L.
    Folch, A.
    Garcia-Orellana, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 596