Three fertility compromises and two transitions

被引:9
|
作者
Caldwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Demog & Sociol Program, Res Sch Social Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
below-replacement fertility; demographic theory; demographic transition; population policy; Second Demographic Transition;
D O I
10.1007/s11113-008-9071-z
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Demographers and those concerned with population policy are increasingly focusing on the steep fertility declines that occurred in developed countries from the 1960s and the consequent widespread below-replacement fertility levels. The decline has been termed the Second Demographic Transition. This paper argues that the recent demographic change can best be understood and analyzed if we broaden the concept to include the first demographic transition, and the three demographically more settled periods preceding, separating, and following the two fertility transitions. These more settled periods or "compromises" are examined to ascertain their nature and so to help predict the likely developments in the present or third compromise. It is argued that the third compromise has now extended for 20 years with little movement in fertility rates or other socioeconomic behavior which has been said to be associated with the second transition, and that this provides sufficient evidence for analysis. The approach has two key aspects. First, it is confined in Europe to countries that distinctly experienced the full five demographic periods, namely northwestern and central Europe. Second, the analysis gains strength by including non-European countries that progressed through all five stages, namely the English-speaking countries of overseas European settlement: USA, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 446
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three Fertility Compromises and Two Transitions
    John C. Caldwell
    [J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 2008, 27 : 427 - 446
  • [2] Misregulation of bromotyrosine compromises fertility in male Drosophila
    Su, Qi
    Xu, Bing
    Chen, Xin
    Rokita, Steven E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (21)
  • [3] Two or Three Children? Turkish Fertility at a Crossroads
    Greulich, Angela
    Dasre, Aurelien
    Inan, Ceren
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2016, 42 (03) : 537 - +
  • [4] Genetic Loss of Faah Compromises Male Fertility in Mice
    Sun, Xiaofei
    Wang, Haibin
    Okabe, Masaru
    Mackie, Kenneth
    Kingsley, Philip J.
    Marnett, Lawrence J.
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    Dey, Sudhansu K.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2009, 80 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [5] TRANSITIONS IN FERTILITY RESEARCH
    HUNT, WL
    SLOAN, CS
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 1992, 38 (02) : 359 - 374
  • [6] Explaining fertility transitions
    Mason, KO
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 1997, 34 (04) : 443 - 454
  • [7] Incumbency and political compromises: Opportunity or threat to sustainability transitions?
    Novalia, Wikke
    Rogers, Briony C.
    Bos, Joannette J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 40 : 680 - 698
  • [8] Two parameters for three-dimensional wetting transitions
    Swain, PS
    Parry, AO
    [J]. EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1997, 37 (03): : 207 - 212
  • [9] Loss of the Nuclear Receptor Corepressor SLIRP Compromises Male Fertility
    Colley, Shane M.
    Wintle, Larissa
    Searles, Richelle
    Russell, Victoria
    Firman, Renee C.
    Smith, Stephanie
    DeBoer, Kathleen
    Merriner, D. Jo
    Genevieve, Ben
    Bentel, Jacqueline M.
    Stuckey, Bronwyn G. A.
    Phillips, Michael R.
    Simmons, Leigh W.
    de Kretser, David M.
    O'Bryan, Moira K.
    Leedman, Peter J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [10] The causes of stalling fertility transitions
    Bongaarts, J
    [J]. STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2006, 37 (01) : 1 - 16