Measuring the social costs of suboptimal combinations of policy instruments: A general framework and an example

被引:4
|
作者
Bullock, DS
Salhofer, K
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Dept Econ Polit & Law, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
social costs; policy instruments; suboptimal combinations;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00022-X
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Since most agricultural programs employ two or more policy instruments simultaneously, it is notable that little research has attempted to find optimal instrument combinations and no research exists which evaluates the social costs (unrealized benefits) of combining instruments suboptimally. In our paper we report a simple and feasible method to find optimal policy instrument combinations, and we provide the first general, formal approach to measuring the social costs of suboptimal policy instrument combinations. Our approach is illustrated in an analysis for five major U.S. crops (corn, feed grains, wheat, rice, cotton). The simple model we employ for the illustration suggests that except for the feed grains program, the observed programs combined policy instruments quite suboptimally, We conclude that agricultural economics research now can and should begin placing increased emphasis on studying optimal policy instrument combinations, (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Measuring social costs of inefficient combination of policy instruments: The case of the US agricultural policy
    Bullock, DS
    Salhofer, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (05) : 1389 - 1389
  • [2] ANALYTIC FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SOCIAL COSTS
    BAILEY, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1962, 44 (02): : 564 - 574
  • [3] ANALYTIC FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SOCIAL COSTS - DISCUSSION
    HURWICZ, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1962, 44 (02): : 574 - 579
  • [4] Abatement Technologies and their Social Costs in a Hybrid General Equilibrium Framework
    Miess, Michael
    Schmelzer, Stefan
    Scasny, Milan
    Kopecna, Vedunka
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (02): : 153 - 180
  • [5] MEASURING THE INTANGIBLES IN SOCIAL DECISIONS - ASSESSING BENEFITS AND COSTS OF ENERGY-POLICY OPTIONS
    MITCHELL, KH
    SOYE, MP
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1983, 25 (02) : 135 - 145
  • [6] RESEARCHING SOCIAL SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST: AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK DERIVED FROM UNDERLYING POLICY SYSTEMS
    Humer, Alois
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2014, 21 (01) : 65 - 82
  • [7] Measuring subjective well-being for policy purposes: The example of well-being indicators in the WHO "Health 2020" framework
    Vik, Mari Hagtvedt
    Carlquist, Erik
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 46 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [8] Management of Monetary Policy in the Framework of Decision Making on Setting Interest Rates for Sustainable Social System: Example of the Russian Federation
    Chupina, Zhanna
    Abanina, Irina
    Abramov, Valery
    Artamonova, Kira
    Yurchenko, Oksana
    Osipova, Irina
    Stroev, Pavel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [9] Development of a framework for identifying and measuring collective control as a social determinant of health: findings from an evaluation of a natural policy experiment in empowerment
    Ponsford, Ruth
    Collins, Michelle
    Egan, Matt
    Lewis, Sue
    Orton, Lois
    Salway, Sarah
    Townsend, Anne
    Halliday, Emma
    Whitehead, Margaret
    Popay, Jennie
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 : S64 - S64