What happened to long-term care in the health reform debate of 1993-1994? Lessons for the future

被引:15
|
作者
Wiener, JM
Estes, CL
Goldenson, SM
Goldberg, SC
机构
[1] Urban Inst, Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
MILBANK QUARTERLY | 2001年 / 79卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.00204
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
During 1993 and 1994, the United States debated but did not enact major health care reform. Although the reform efforts focused on providing health coverage for the uninsured and controlling acute care costs, many proposals included substantial long-term care initiatives. President Clinton proposed creating a large home-care program for severely disabled people of all ages and all income groups, among several other initiatives. By stressing non-means-tested public programs, the president's plan was a major departure from the Medicaid-dominated financing system for long-term care. In designing the long-term care component, the Clinton administration addressed many of the basic policy choices that must be decided in all reform efforts, including whether initiatives should be limited to older people or cover people of any age, how to balance institutional and noninstitutional care, whether to rely on government programs or on the private sector, and how to control costs. Analyzing the political and intellectual history of long-term care during the health reform debate provides lessons for future reform.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / +
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条