Testing evolutionary hypotheses about human biological adaptation using cross-cultural comparison

被引:26
|
作者
Mace, R [1 ]
Jordan, F [1 ]
Holden, C [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Anthropol, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
comparative method; human sex ratio; lactose tolerance; phylogeny; gene-culture co-evolution; adaptation; maternal mortality; natural selection;
D O I
10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00019-9
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Physiological data from a range of human populations living in different environments can provide valuable information for testing evolutionary hypotheses about human adaptation. By taking into account the effects of population history, phylogenetic comparative methods can help us determine whether variation results from selection due to particular environmental variables. These selective forces could even be due to cultural traits-which means that gene-culture co-evolution may be occurring. In this paper, we outline two examples of the use of these approaches to test adaptive hypotheses that explain global variation in two physiological traits: the first is lactose digestion capacity in adults, and the second is population sex-ratio at birth. We show that lower than average sex ratio at birth is associated with high fertility, and argue that global variation in sex ratio at birth has evolved as a response to the high physiological costs of producing boys in high fertility populations. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds - Cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses
    Quinlan, Robert J.
    Quinlan, Marsha B.
    [J]. CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (02) : 149 - 169
  • [3] Cross-cultural adaptation of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire into Portuguese
    Salgado, Teresa
    Marques, Alexandra
    Geraldes, Leonor
    Benrimoj, Shalom
    Horne, Robert
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    [J]. SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 131 (02): : 88 - 94
  • [4] Cultural Conflict and Cross-cultural Adaptation
    Zhang Yuan
    [J]. 学术界, 2014, (10) : 279 - 284
  • [5] Cross-cultural evolutionary psychology
    Apicella, Coren L.
    Barrett, H. Clark
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7 : 92 - 97
  • [6] A cross-cultural test of competing hypotheses about system justification using data from 42 nations
    Valdes, Evan A.
    Liu, James H.
    Williams, Matt
    Carr, Stuart C.
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] Dog-Human Coevolution: Cross-Cultural Analysis of Multiple Hypotheses
    Chambers, Jaime
    Quinlan, Marsha B.
    Evans, Alexis
    Quinlan, Robert J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 2020, 40 (04) : 414 - 433
  • [8] On the Understanding of Cross-cultural Adaptation
    袁薇薇
    [J]. 英语广场, 2012, (06) : 103 - 104
  • [9] Genes and Cross-Cultural Adaptation
    Kashima, Emiko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 875 - 875
  • [10] Perception of human ecology: A cross-cultural comparison
    Eisler, A
    Yoshida, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 124 - 124