共 50 条
Smoking -Cessation Interventions After Lung Cancer Screening Guideline Change
被引:10
|作者:
Li, Jiang
[1
]
Chung, Sukyung
[1
]
Martinez, Meghan C.
[1
]
Luft, Harold S.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Palo Alto Med Fdn, Res Inst, Sutter Hlth, Ctr Hlth Syst Res, Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA
关键词:
PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS;
TREATING TOBACCO USE;
DEPENDENCE;
SMOKERS;
ADULTS;
IMPLEMENTATION;
ASSOCIATION;
ATTITUDES;
SERVICES;
PROGRAMS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.031
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Recent guideline changes for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography recommend smoking-cessation interventions be done in parallel with screening. The purpose of this study is to determine the post-guideline rates of smoking-cessation interventions among patients eligible and ineligible for lung cancer screening. Methods: Using electronic health records collected from a large ambulatory care system in northern California between 2010 and 2017, authors identified new patients who were current smokers aged 55–80 years visiting a primary care provider, and grouped patients into lung cancer screening–eligible heavy smokers, screening-ineligible moderate smokers, and screening-ineligible light smokers. Screening-eligible smokers versus screening-ineligible smokers were compared in receipt of smoking-cessation interventions before (2010–2013) and after (2014–2017) the guideline change, overall and by intervention type (formal counseling, informal counseling, pharmacotherapy) using hierarchical generalized linear models. Analyses were conducted in 2018–2019. Results: After the guideline change, the likelihood of receiving any smoking-cessation intervention (OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.28, 1.61, p<0.05), informal counseling (OR=1.29, 95% CI=1.15, 1.46, p<0.05), and pharmacotherapy (OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.02, 1.50, p<0.05) during a new patient visit significantly increased, with the increase not varying by level of smoking. For formal counseling, the post-guideline increase was greater for screening-eligible heavy smokers (OR=3.15, 95% CI=1.18, 8.36, p<0.05) and moderate smokers (OR=3.58, 95% CI=1.29, 9.95, p<0.05) relative to light smokers. Conclusions: Smoking-cessation interventions increased after new lung cancer screening guidelines. Given the sizable adverse impacts of smoking on morbidity and mortality, small increases in the implementation of smoking-cessation interventions could have substantial public health benefits. © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 97
页数:10
相关论文