Predictors for unintentional medication reconciliation discrepancies in preadmission medication: a systematic review

被引:37
|
作者
Hias, Julie [1 ]
Van der Linden, Lorenz [1 ,2 ]
Spriet, Isabel [1 ,2 ]
Vanbrabant, Peter [3 ]
Willems, Ludo [1 ,2 ]
Tournoy, Jos [4 ,5 ]
De Winter, Sabrina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Pharm, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Leuven, Dept Pharmaceut & Pharmacol Sci Clin Pharmacol &, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Gen Internal Med, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Geriatr Med, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Leuven, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Medication reconciliation; Reconciliation discrepancies; Hospitalization; Risk stratification; High-risk patients; Predictors; ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; RISK-FACTORS; PHARMACIST INTERVENTION; CLINICAL IMPACT; ERRORS; HISTORY; TRANSITIONS; DISCHARGE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-017-2308-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Discrepancies in preadmission medication (PAM) are common and potentially harmful. Medication reconciliation is able to reduce the discrepancy rate, yet implementation is challenging. In order for reconciliation efforts to be more cost-effective, patients at high risk for reconciliation errors should be identified. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify predictors for unintentional discrepancies in PAM. Medline and Embase were searched systematically until June 2017. Only studies concerning adult subjects were retained. Quantitative studies were included if predictors for unintentional discrepancies in the PAM had been determined on hospital admission. Variables were divided into patient-, medication-, and setting-related predictors based on a thematic analysis. Studies on identification of predictors for discrepancies and potentially harmful discrepancies were handled separately. Thirty-five studies were eligible, of which 5 studies focused on potentially harmful discrepancies. The following 16 significant variables were identified using multivariable prediction models: number of preadmission drugs, patient's age, availability of a drug list, patients' understanding of medication, usage of different outpatient pharmacies, number of high-risk drugs, discipline for which the patient is admitted, admitting physician's experience, number and type of consulted sources, patient's gender, type of care before admission, number of outpatient visits during the past year, class of medication, number of reimbursements, use of an electronic prescription system, and type of admission (elective vs emergency). The number of preadmission drugs was identified as a predictor in 20 studies. Potentially harmful discrepancies were ascertained in 5 studies with age found to have a predictive value in all 5 studies. Multiple suitable predictors for PAM-related discrepancies were identified of which higher age and polypharmacy were reported most frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1377
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors for unintentional medication reconciliation discrepancies in preadmission medication: a systematic review
    Julie Hias
    Lorenz Van der Linden
    Isabel Spriet
    Peter Vanbrabant
    Ludo Willems
    Jos Tournoy
    Sabrina De Winter
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, 73 : 1355 - 1377
  • [2] Medication reconciliation: Predictors of risk of unintentional medication discrepancies in the cardiology department
    Chung, Cecile
    Gauthier, Victoria
    Marques-Tavares, Filomena
    Hindlet, Patrick
    Cohen, Ariel
    Fernandez, Christine
    Antignac, Marie
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 112 (02) : 104 - 112
  • [3] The medication reconciliation process and classification of discrepancies: a systematic review
    Almanasreh, Enas
    Moles, Rebekah
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 82 (03) : 645 - 658
  • [4] Comparative Evaluation of Intentional versus Unintentional Medication Discrepancies during Admission Medication Reconciliation
    Abdelaziz, H.
    Levesque, T.
    Smith, A.
    Michele, L.
    St-Yves, J.
    Landry-Leblanc, S.
    Lussier, S.
    Savoie, M.
    Gagnon, J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2019, 72 (01): : 80 - 81
  • [5] Medication Reconciliation Practices and Potential Clinical Impact of Unintentional Discrepancies
    Michel, Bruno
    Quelennec, Bapiste
    Andres, Emmanuel
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (03) : 246 - 247
  • [6] Effect of Medication Reconciliation on Unintentional Medication Discrepancies in Acute Hospital Admissions of Elderly Adults: A Multicenter Study
    van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
    van der Schrieck-de Loos, Erica M.
    van der Linden, Christien
    Theeuwes, Annemiek M. L. J.
    Pol, Albert G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2013, 61 (08) : 1262 - 1268
  • [7] Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alemayehu B. Mekonnen
    Tamrat B. Abebe
    Andrew J. McLachlan
    Jo-anne E. Brien
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16
  • [8] Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mekonnen, Alemayehu B.
    Abebe, Tamrat B.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Brien, Jo-anne E.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16
  • [9] CLOSE THE GAP - MEDICATION DISCREPANCIES REVEALED BY MEDICATION RECONCILIATION
    Damlien, L.
    Viktil, K. K.
    Rossum-Iversen, E.
    Olsen, C. L.
    Bergmann, L.
    Borgen, T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 : 1334 - 1334
  • [10] Identification of medication discrepancies on medication reconciliation during hospital admission
    Wang, Mei-Wen
    Liang, Hsun-Yin
    Ou, Huang-Tz
    Yeh, Pheng-Ying
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 411 - 412