COMPARISON OF OPTIMAL PATH PLANNING ALGORITHMS FOR INTELLIGENT CONTROL OF ROBOTIC PART ASSEMBLY TASK

被引:5
|
作者
Son, Changman [1 ]
机构
[1] DanKook Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Yongin 330714, South Korea
关键词
Path planning algorithms; comparison; fuzzy theory versus neural network; fuzzy entropy; optimality criterion; machine intelligence; uncertainty; fuzziness; vision sensor;
D O I
10.1142/S0218488510006726
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Two intelligent part-bringing (path planning or finding) algorithms, to bring a part from an initial position to an assembly hole or a receptacle (target or destination) for a purpose of part mating, related to a robotic part assembly task are introduced. These algorithms are then compared through simulations and several criteria. An entropy function, which is a useful measure of the variability and the information in terms of uncertainty, is introduced to measure its overall performance of a task execution related to the part-bringing task. Fuzzy set theory, well-suited to a management of uncertainty, is introduced to address an uncertainty associated with the part-bringing procedure. A degree of uncertainty associated with a part-bringing is used as an optimality criterion, or cost function, e.g. minimum fuzzy entropy, for a specific task execution. It is shown that the machine organizer using a sensor system can intelligently determine an optimal control value, based on explicit performance criteria, to overcome environmental uncertainty. The algorithms use knowledge processing functions such as machine reasoning, planning, inferencing, learning, and decision-making. The results show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 644
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of optimal motion planning algorithms for intelligent control of robotic part micro-assembly task
    Son, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2006, 46 (05): : 508 - 517
  • [2] Comparison of intelligent control planning algorithms for robot's part micro-assembly task
    Son, C
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2006, 19 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [3] Comparison of optimal path planning algorithms
    Korkmaz, Mehmet
    Durdu, Akif
    [J]. 2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TRENDS IN RADIOELECTRONICS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (TCSET), 2018, : 255 - 258
  • [4] Optimal Sequential Task Assignment and Path Finding for Multi-Agent Robotic Assembly Planning
    Brown, Kyle
    Peltzer, Oriana
    Sehr, Martin A.
    Schwager, Mac
    Kochenderfer, Mykel J.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2020, : 441 - 447
  • [5] Intelligent task level planning for robotic assembly: Issues and experiments
    Castuera, JC
    Lopez-Juarez, I
    [J]. MICAI 2004: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 2972 : 872 - 881
  • [6] A comparison of homotopic path planning algorithms for robotic applications
    Hernandez, Emili
    Carreras, Marc
    Ridao, Pere
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2015, 64 : 44 - 58
  • [7] ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY AND TASK PLANNING
    KAK, A
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 1990, 11 (01) : 9 - 9
  • [8] Optimal assembly path planning algorithm for aircraft part maintenance
    Christiand
    Yoon, Jungwon
    [J]. 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 916 - 920
  • [9] Robotic furniture assembly: task abstraction, motion planning, and control
    Park, Suhan
    Lee, Haeseong
    Kim, Seungyeon
    Baek, Jiyeong
    Jang, Keunwoo
    Kim, Hyoung Cheol
    Kim, Myeongsoo
    Park, Jaeheung
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SERVICE ROBOTICS, 2022, 15 (04) : 441 - 457
  • [10] Robotic furniture assembly: task abstraction, motion planning, and control
    Suhan Park
    Haeseong Lee
    Seungyeon Kim
    Jiyeong Baek
    Keunwoo Jang
    Hyoung Cheol Kim
    Myeongsoo Kim
    Jaeheung Park
    [J]. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2022, 15 : 441 - 457