A comparative study of critical slip surface in 2D and 3D stability analysis of slopes

被引:0
|
作者
Xie, M [1 ]
Esaki, I [1 ]
Zhou, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Inst Environm Syst, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 812, Japan
来源
ROCK STRESS | 2003年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Various methods of optimization or random search have been developed for locating the critical slip surface of a slope and the related minimum safety factor. But all these methods are based on a two-dimensional (2D) method and no one had been adapted for a search of the three-dimensional (3D) critical slip surface. In this paper, a new Monte Carlo random simulating method has been proposed to identify the 3D critical slip surface, in which assuming the initial slip to be the lower part of an ellipsoid, the 3D critical slip surface in the 3D slope stability analysis is located by minimizing the 3D safety factor. Based on a column-based three-dimensional slope stability analysis model, a new Geographic Information Systems (GIS) grid-based 3D deterministic model is developed to calculate the 3D safety factor. Several practical examples, of obtained minimum safety factor and its critical slip surface by a 2D optimization or random technique, are extended to 3D slope problems to locate the 3D critical slip surface and to compare with the 2D results. The results shows that, comparing with the 2D results, the resulting 3D critical slip surface has no apparent difference only from a cross section, but the associated 3D safety factor is definitely higher.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study on Locating Critical Slip Surface in 2D and 3D Limit Equilibrium Stability Analysis of Slopes
    Xie, Mowen
    Wang, Zengfu
    Liu, Xiangyu
    Jia, Ning
    [J]. TRENDS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 446-449 : 1905 - +
  • [2] Automated cell analysis in 2D and 3D: A comparative study
    Meyer, Michael G.
    Fauver, Mark
    Rahn, J. Richard
    Neumann, Thomas
    Patten, Florence W.
    Seibel, Eric J.
    Nelson, Alan C.
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2009, 42 (01) : 141 - 146
  • [3] Comparative 2D and 3D analysis of a resin composite surface.
    Waplington, M
    Blunt, L
    Lumley, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2248 - 2248
  • [4] 3D linear stability analysis of 2D free surface flows
    Wilkes, ED
    Hopkins, M
    [J]. MOVING BOUNDARIES VII: COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING OF FREE AND MOVING BOUNDARY PROBLEMS, 2004, 10 : 209 - 214
  • [5] Analysis of Clay Slopes with Piles Using 2D and 3D FEM
    Sobhey, Mohamed
    Shahien, Marawan
    El Sawwaf, Mostafa
    Farouk, Ahmed
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 39 (03) : 2623 - 2631
  • [6] Analysis of Clay Slopes with Piles Using 2D and 3D FEM
    Mohamed Sobhey
    Marawan Shahien
    Mostafa El Sawwaf
    Ahmed Farouk
    [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021, 39 : 2623 - 2631
  • [7] Assessing 2D and 3D Heatmaps for Comparative Analysis: An Empirical Study
    Kraus, Matthias
    Angerbauer, Katrin
    Buchmueller, Juri
    Schweitzer, Daniel
    Keim, Daniel A.
    Sedlmair, Michael
    Fuchs, Johannes
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'20), 2020,
  • [8] Comparative Study on EQWEAP Analysis with 2D/3D FE Solutions
    Chang, D. -W
    Wang, Y. -C
    Wu, W. -L
    Chin, C. -T
    [J]. CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIONS IN GEOTECHNICS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2013, : 691 - 694
  • [9] LEM for Stability Analysis of 3D Slopes with General-Shaped Slip Surfaces
    Deng Dong-ping
    Li Liang
    Zhao Lian-Heng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2017, 17 (10)
  • [10] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    [J]. IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58