Importance of traceability for sustainable production: a cross-country comparison

被引:19
|
作者
Myae, Aye Chan [1 ]
Goddard, Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Resource Econ & Environm Sociol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
Traceability; sustainable production; locus of control; food; ordered probit; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PERCEIVED RISK; CONSUMER CONFIDENCE; FOOD-CONSUMPTION; MEAT SECTOR; QUALITY; DETERMINANTS; SAFETY; TRUST; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01084.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Traceability systems are becoming an important tool for tracking, monitoring and managing product flows through food supply chains. Traceability can be used as a method of certifying production, processing and nutritional credence attributes of food products. Environmentally sustainable production is a credence attribute that is gaining in importance in the eyes of consumers. In this research, the importance of traceability in verifying environmentally sustainable production practices is examined. The data were collected in online surveys related to consumer's perceptions and concerns about food safety, trust and reported behaviour related to meat consumption in three countries Canada, the US and Japan. Determinants of traceability in verifying environmentally sustainable production practices include respondents' locus of control about food safety, food purchasing characteristics such as whether they normally buy organic products or shop at supermarkets and general traits such as worry and trust. In comparing across countries, there are significant differences in the interests in traceability to verify environmentally sustainable production practices and in the determinants of level of importance ascribed.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 202
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the attitude towards the adoption of a sustainable diet: a cross-country comparison
    Pucci, Tommaso
    Casprini, Elena
    Sogari, Giovanni
    Zanni, Lorenzo
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2021, 124 (13): : 290 - 304
  • [2] Production and operations managers and logistics managers: a cross-country comparison
    Burcher, Peter G.
    Lee, Gloria L.
    Sohal, Amrik S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 18 (05) : 549 - 560
  • [3] INSTITUTIONS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS
    Iacobuta, Andreea-Oana
    Mursa, Gabriel Claudiu
    Mihai, Costica
    Cautisanu, Cristina
    Cismas, Laura Mariana
    [J]. TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2019, 18 (2A): : 628 - 646
  • [4] A cross-country comparison and validation of firms' stakeholder considerations in sustainable business practices
    Karlsson, Niklas P. E.
    Laurell, Helene
    Lindgren, John
    Pehrsson, Tobias
    Andersson, Svante
    Svensson, Goeran
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2018, 18 (03): : 408 - 424
  • [5] Cross-country comparison on environmental impacts of particleboard production in Brazil and Spain
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Ferro, Fabiane Salles
    Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Rocco Lahr, Francisco Antonio
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 150
  • [6] Aging in Europe: A cross-country comparison
    Nicoletti, C
    Peracchi, F
    [J]. PENSION POLICY IN AN INTEGRATING EUROPE, 2003, : 23 - 66
  • [7] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Jiancheng Guan
    Kairui Zuo
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100 : 541 - 575
  • [8] Trust and deforestation: A cross-country comparison
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    Murtazashvili, Jennifer
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 : 111 - 119
  • [9] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Zuo, Kairui
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 100 (02) : 541 - 575
  • [10] Optimism and pessimism: A cross-country comparison
    Rehman, Fahd
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (11): : 3025 - 3038