Model the Effects of Core/Coil Size and Defect Length on Eddy Current Response

被引:4
|
作者
Mooers, Ryan D. [1 ]
Aldrin, John C. [2 ]
Knopp, Jeremy S. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Labs, Mat State Awareness & Supportabil Branch AFRL RXC, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Computat Tools, Gurnee, IL 60031 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.4914635
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Prior split D differential probe validation studies have consistently shown model discrepancy in transition regions between the main peaks of the probe response. These discrepancies may be the result of differences in probe input dimensions, numerical error in the simulation code, or unforeseen variables in the experimental setup and data collection. This paper will investigate the effect of improved dimensional modeling, core size, and defect length have on reducing the discrepancy between model and experiment. A complete description of the experimental and modeling study will be presented. Comparisons will be made between the experimental data and the simulated results and conclusions will be presented. The study should provide insight into how probe and defect dimensions affect the simulated response of a probe. Also it will detail how the inclusion of asymmetry into model could improve agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 404
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Eddy Current Response to Lay Length of Wire Rope with Pancake Coil and Experimental Study
    Li, Tengyu
    Kou, Ziming
    Wu, Juan
    Jiao, Shaoni
    Mao, Qinghua
    [J]. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56 (16): : 13 - 21
  • [2] Estimation of defect depth on plates by eddy-current coil array
    Xia, Zihan
    Huang, Ruochen
    Shao, Yuchun
    Bai, Xue
    Yin, Wuliang
    [J]. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2024, 369
  • [3] Study on the Optimization of Eddy Current Testing Coil and the Defect Detection Sensitivity
    Zhou, H. T.
    Hou, K.
    Pan, H. L.
    Chen, J. J.
    Wang, Q. M.
    [J]. PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE, 2015, 130 : 1649 - 1657
  • [4] Influence of Core and Shield of Coil on Skin Depth in Eddy Current Testing
    Chen, Maosen
    Liao, Yanfei
    Zeng, Zhiwei
    Lin, Junming
    Dai, Yonghong
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2022, 33 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [5] Transient response of a driver coil in transient eddy current testing
    Desjardins, D. R.
    Krause, T. W.
    Clapham, L.
    [J]. NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 73 : 22 - 27
  • [6] Research on Eddy Current Testing of the Lay Length of Wire Rope with Rectangular Coil
    Li, Junxia
    Li, Conghao
    Jiao, Shaoni
    Li, Tengyu
    Kou, Ziming
    [J]. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56 (12): : 34 - 41
  • [7] Influence of coil bending angle on the defect detection ability of flexible eddy current sensor
    Wu, Bin
    Yang, Ting
    Liu, Xiucheng
    He, Cunfu
    [J]. Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2020, 41 (04): : 41 - 48
  • [8] EFFECT OF PRIMARY COIL SIZE ON EDDY-CURRENT DECAY RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
    HARTWIG, KT
    HUA, CY
    MCDONALD, LC
    [J]. CRYOGENICS, 1991, 31 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [9] Eddy current effects in the core of a magnetic field sensor
    Albanese, R
    Federico, M
    Rubinacci, G
    Formisano, A
    Fresa, R
    [J]. ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (III), 1999, 15 : 3 - 13
  • [10] Effects of coil current phase on eddy current loss of permanent magnets in IPM motors
    Kawase, Yoshihiro
    Yamaguchi, Tadashi
    Hashimoto, Kou
    Nakamura, Masanori
    [J]. COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2006, 25 (03) : 748 - 752