Modified multiple marker aneuploidy screening as a primary screening test for preeclampsia

被引:9
|
作者
Huang, Tianhua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bedford, H. Melanie [1 ,4 ]
Rashid, Shamim [1 ]
Rasasakaram, Evasha [1 ]
Priston, Megan [1 ]
Mak-Tam, Ellen [1 ]
Gibbons, Clare [1 ,5 ]
Meschino, Wendy S. [1 ,4 ]
Cuckle, Howard [6 ]
Mei-Dan, Elad [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] North York Gen Hosp, Genet Program, 4001 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2K 1E1, Canada
[2] Prenatal Screening Ontario, Better Outcomes Registry & Network BORN Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Mol Genet, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[7] North York Gen Hosp, Maternal & Newborn Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Multiple marker screening; Preeclampsia; Gestational hypertension; Preterm birth; Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; Placental growth factor; Human chorionic gonadotropin; Alpha feto-protein; Unconjugated estriol and Inhibin A; MATERNAL SERUM INHIBIN; ANGIOGENIC FACTORS; 3; TRIMESTERS; 1ST-TRIMESTER; BIOMARKERS; 2ND-TRIMESTER; PLASMA; 1ST;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04514-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Abnormal levels of maternal biochemical markers used in multiple marker aneuploidy screening have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aims to assess if a combination of maternal characteristics and biochemical markers in the first and second trimesters can be used to screen for preeclampsia (PE). The secondary aim was to assess this combination in identifying pregnancies at risk for gestational hypertension and preterm birth. Methods This case-control study used information on maternal characteristics and residual blood samples from pregnant women who have undergone multiple marker aneuploidy screening. The median multiple of the median (MoM) of first and second trimester biochemical markers in cases (women with PE, gestational hypertension and preterm birth) and controls were compared. Biochemical markers included pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), alpha feto-protein (AFP), unconjugated estriol (uE3) and Inhibin A. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate screening performance using different marker combinations. Screening performance was defined as detection rate (DR) and false positive rate (FPR). Preterm and early-onset preeclampsia PE were defined as women with PE who delivered at < 37 and < 34 weeks of gestation, respectively. Results There were 147 pregnancies with PE (81 term, 49 preterm and 17 early-onset), 295 with gestational hypertension, and 166 preterm birth. Compared to controls, PE cases had significantly lower median MoM of PAPP-A (0.77 vs 1.10, p < 0.0001), PlGF (0.76 vs 1.01, p < 0.0001) and free-beta hCG (0.81 vs. 0.98, p < 0.001) in the first trimester along with PAPP-A (0.82 vs 0.99, p < 0.01) and PlGF (0.75 vs 1.02, p < 0.0001) in the second trimester. The lowest first trimester PAPP-A, PlGF and free beta-hCG were seen in those with preterm and early-onset PE. At a 20% FPR, 67% of preterm and 76% of early-onset PE cases can be predicted using a combination of maternal characteristics with PAPP-A and PlGF in the first trimester. The corresponding DR was 58% for gestational hypertension and 36% for preterm birth cases. Conclusions Maternal characteristics with first trimester PAPP-A and PlGF measured for aneuploidy screening provided reasonable accuracy in identifying women at risk of developing early onset PE, allowing triage of high-risk women for further investigation and risk-reducing therapy. This combination was less accurate in predicting women who have gestational hypertension or preterm birth.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modified multiple marker aneuploidy screening as a primary screening test for preeclampsia
    Tianhua Huang
    H. Melanie Bedford
    Shamim Rashid
    Evasha Rasasakaram
    Megan Priston
    Ellen Mak-Tam
    Clare Gibbons
    Wendy S. Meschino
    Howard Cuckle
    Elad Mei-Dan
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [2] Performance effect of pregnancy misdating on the multiple marker screening test for fetal aneuploidy
    Owen, John
    Biggio, Joseph
    Hardin, Michael
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 35S - 35S
  • [3] Inhibin-A - A screening marker for preeclampsia
    Segal, Shimon
    Safajou, Chista
    Karp, Steven
    Mercado, Ray
    Veenstra, Korina
    Rivnay, Benjamin
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 35S - 35S
  • [4] MULTIPLE MARKER SCREENING
    DICKERSON, VM
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 161 (02): : 161 - 161
  • [5] Implementation of Multiple Marker Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in a Single Tertiary Obstetric Centre
    Okun, Nanette
    Hoffman, Barry
    Johnson, Joann
    Biringer, Anne
    Shapiro, Jodi
    Felix, Carmen
    Van Mieghem, Tim
    Abbasi, Nimrah
    Metcalfe, Amy
    Maxey, Connor
    Snelgrove, John W.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [6] Prenatal screening and diagnosis of aneuploidy in multiple pregnancies
    Gagnon, Alain
    Audibert, Francois
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) : 285 - 294
  • [7] Screening for Aneuploidy in Multiple Gestations The Challenges and Options
    Bender, Whitney
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (01) : 41 - +
  • [8] Placental protein 13 as a first trimester screening marker for aneuploidy
    Koster, M. P. H.
    Wortelboer, E. J.
    Cuckle, H. S.
    Stoutenbeek, Ph.
    Visser, G. H. A.
    Schielen, P. C. J. I.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (13) : 1237 - 1241
  • [9] Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening
    McReynolds, Susanna
    Vanderlinden, Lauren
    Stevens, John
    Hansen, Kirk
    Schoolcraft, William B.
    Katz-Jaffe, Mandy G.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (08) : 2631 - 2633
  • [10] Aneuploidy screening: Newer noninvasive test gains traction
    Nickolich, Sarah
    Farahi, Narges
    Jones, Kohar
    Mounsey, Anne
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 65 (01): : 49 - 52