Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Sung-Wan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Kyeong [1 ]
Han, Ji Hun [1 ]
Jhon, Min [2 ]
Kim, Ju-Wan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ju-Yeon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Min [2 ]
Na, Hyun Ju [4 ]
Kang, Young-Shin [5 ]
Chung, Young-Chul [6 ]
Yoon, Jin-Sang [2 ]
机构
[1] Gwangju Bukgu Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Mindlink, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Psychiat, Med Sch, 160 Baekseo Ro, Gwangju 61469, South Korea
[3] Gwangju Mental Hlth Commiss, Gwangju, South Korea
[4] Dong Kang Univ, Dept Nursing, Gwangju, South Korea
[5] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, Gwangju, South Korea
[6] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Psychiat, Med Sch, Jeonju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Schizophrenia; Ultra-high risk; Attenuated psychosis syndrome; Prodrome; CAPE-15; ULTRA-HIGH-RISK; EPPENDORF SCHIZOPHRENIA INVENTORY; CLINICAL HIGH-RISK; PRODROMAL QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF-REPORT; PSYCHOSIS; PEOPLE; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE; CAPE-P15;
D O I
10.30773/pi.2019.0215
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-15 item positive scale (CAPE-15) in college students. Methods This study had two stages: initial screening with self-report questionnaires including the CAPE-15, and semi-structured interviews to investigate the instrument's diagnostic validity. The initial screening involved 1,749 college students. The modified Korean version of Prodromal Questionnaire-16 item (mKPQ-16) was also administered. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis in the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. Results Twelve of the interviewed subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest (0.936) for the CAPE-15 distress score (p<0.001). The use of 6 as the cutoff for the CAPE-15 distress score resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (85.2%), with a favorable positive predictive value of 32.4%. The coefficients of correlation between the CAPE-15 and mKPQ-16 were significant. Conclusion The Korean version of the CAPE-15 is a good instrument for screening for psychosis risk in collegiate settings. The validation of this scale could contribute to the early identification of psychosis in the Korean community.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 311
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VALIDATION OF THE KOREAN VERSION OF THE 15-ITEM COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT OF PSYCHIC EXPERIENCES (CAPE-15) IN A COLLEGE POPULATION
    Kim, Sung-Wan
    Kim, Jung Jin
    Kim, Yeonghyeok
    Jo, Anna
    Kim, Jae-Kyeong
    Kim, Jae-Min
    Chung, Young Chul
    Yoon, Jin-Sang
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 : S265 - S265
  • [2] Validation of the Korean Version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in General Population
    Sim, Hyejin
    Kim, Seoyoung
    Jung, Paul Guyun
    Bloomfield, Michael
    Kim, Euitae
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 20 (07) : 625 - +
  • [3] Psychometric properties of the 15-item positive subscale of the community assessment of psychic experiences
    Sun, Meng
    Wang, Dongfang
    Jing, Ling
    Xi, Chang
    Dai, Libo
    Zhou, Liang
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2020, 222 : 160 - 166
  • [4] Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent general population
    Mark, Winifred
    Toulopoulou, Timothea
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 26 : 58 - 65
  • [5] Validation of the Czech version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE)
    Kerkova, Barbora
    Martinkova, Zorka
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2019, 63 (06): : 627 - 643
  • [6] Validation of the Czech version of the community assessment of psychic experiences (CAPE)
    Kerkova, B.
    Martinkova, Z.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 : S816 - S817
  • [7] Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale
    Roets, Arne
    Van Hiel, Alain
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale
    Ko, Eun
    Kim, Hye Young
    Bartone, Paul T.
    Kang, Hee Sun
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2018, 23 : 1287 - 1298
  • [9] Development and validation of the Italian version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale
    Picardi, Angelo
    Bartone, Paul T.
    Querci, Raffaella
    Bitetti, Daniela
    Tarsitani, Lorenzo
    Roselli, Valentina
    Maraone, Annalisa
    Fabi, Elisa
    De Michele, Francesco
    Gaviano, Ilaria
    Flynn, Brian
    Ursano, Robert
    Biondi, Massimo
    RIVISTA DI PSICHIATRIA, 2012, 47 (03) : 231 - 237
  • [10] Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample
    Ragazzi, Taciana C. C.
    Shuhama, Rosana
    Sinval, Jorge
    Maroco, Joao
    Corsi-Zuelli, Fabiana
    da Roza, Daiane L.
    van Os, Jim
    Menezes, Paulo R.
    Del-Ben, Cristina M.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 42 (04) : 389 - 397