Social Impact Bonds: The Role of Private Capital in Outcome-Based Commissioning

被引:82
|
作者
Edmiston, Daniel [1 ]
Nicholls, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Pk End St, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
关键词
UK WORK PROGRAM; SECTOR; PAYMENT;
D O I
10.1017/S0047279417000125
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Social impact bonds are payment by results contracts that leverage private social investment to cover the up-front expenditure associated with welfare services. The introduction of private principles and actors through outcome-based commissioning has received a great deal of attention in social policy research. However, there has been much less attention given to the introduction of private capital and its relation to more established forms of quasi-marketisation. This paper examines what effect private social investment has on outcome-based commissioning and whether the alternative forms of performance measurement and management, that social impact bonds bring to bear on service operations, demonstrate the capacity to engender: innovation in service delivery; improved social outcomes; future cost savings; and additionality. This paper draws on an in-depth study of four social impact bonds in the UK context, as the welfare regime at the vanguard of this policy development. The findings suggest that the introduction of private capital in outcome-based commissioning has had a number of unique and unintended effects on service providers, operations and outcomes. The paper concludes by considering whether social impact bonds represent a risk or an opportunity for public service reform both in the UK and further afield.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 76
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Payment by results and social impact bonds: Outcome-based payment systems in the UK and US
    Crossley, Stephen
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 54 (03) : 528 - 529
  • [2] Outcome-based providing and commissioning: pathways and standards
    Kingdon, David
    BJPSYCH BULLETIN, 2019, 43 (06): : 282 - 286
  • [3] Outcome-based commissioning: has its time come?
    Ballard, Tim
    Hicks, Nicholas
    Paynton, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (644): : E219 - E221
  • [4] Outcome-Based Typology of Social Enterprises: Interlacing Individual Transformation, Capital Provision, and Societal Influence
    Polychronopoulos, Georgios
    Lukes, Martin
    Sansone, Giuliano
    Agrawal, Anirudh
    Ulrich-Diener, Florian
    Losova, Veronika Slapakova
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024,
  • [5] Improving private land conservation with outcome-based biodiversity payments
    McDonald, Jane A.
    Helmstedt, Kate J.
    Bode, Michael
    Coutts, Shaun
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (03) : 1476 - 1485
  • [6] Outcome-based evaluation of national health and social programs
    Vecchiato, T
    ASSESSING OUTCOMES IN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: COMPARATIVE DESIGN AND POLICY ISSUES, 2002, : 48 - 60
  • [7] Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds
    Warner, Mildred E.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2013, 16 (04) : 303 - 319
  • [8] The Role of Laptop as a platform in an Outcome-Based Learning Environment
    Bataineh, Emad
    Tubaishat, Abdallah
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE, HYBRID, AND ON-LINE LEARNING (ELML), 2009, : 77 - 83
  • [9] Social service, private gain: The political economy of social impact bonds
    Fraser, Alec
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 57 (06) : 997 - 998
  • [10] Analyzing the impact of social capital on US based Kickstarter projects outcome
    Onginjo, Joseph Ochieng
    Zhou, Dong Mei
    Berhanu, Tesema Fiseha
    Belihu, Sime Welde Gebrile
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (07)