PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Gynecological Cancers

被引:22
|
作者
Dejanovic, Danijela [1 ]
Hansen, Naja Liv [1 ]
Loft, Annika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
MALIGNANT PERITONEAL MESOTHELIOMA; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE GENITAL TUBERCULOSIS; PELVIC-INFLAMMATORY-DISEASE; OVARIAN-CANCER; FDG-PET/CT; F-18-FDG UPTAKE; CT FINDINGS; ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA; IMAGING FEATURES;
D O I
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The role of hybrid imaging with 2-[18F] flourodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) is continuously evolving and now considered standard practice in evaluation of disease stage, treatment response, recurrent disease and follow-up for numerous primary malignancies. In gynecological malignancies FDG PET/CT plays an important role, not only in the assessment of disease in the pre-and post-therapy setting, but also in radiation therapy (RT) planning by defining the metabolically active gross tumor volume (GTV. The glucose analogue radiotracer, FDG, is by far the most utilized radiotracer in PET/CT and is typically seen with high uptake in malignant cells. The radiotracer FDG has a high sensitivity but low specificity for malignancy, as benign processes with an inflammatory response for example infection, are also FDG-avid. In the evaluation of the female pelvic region an awareness of potential confounding factors in the interpretation of FDG is essential as variations of FDG uptake occur in accordance with the menstrual cycle and the menopausal state. Incidental imaging findings in the female genital can pose differential diagnostic challenges as false-positive and false-negative findings in benign and malignant processes are not uncommon. Gynecological malignancies continue to pose major public health problems with cervical cancer as the fourth most common cancer in women ranking after breast cancer, colorectal cancer and lung cancer. Familiarity with frequently encountered benign and malignant variants and pitfalls in FDG PET/CT in the female pelvic region can aid the reader in differential diagnostic considerations. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 610
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Breast Cancers
    Kikano, Elias George
    Avril, Stefanie
    Marshall, Holly
    Jones, Robert Stanley
    Montero, Alberto J.
    Avril, Norbert
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) : 474 - 484
  • [2] Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers
    Jayaprakasam, Vetri Sudar
    Paroder, Viktoriya
    Schoder, Heiko
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) : 485 - 501
  • [3] Pearls and pitfalls in gynecological PET-CT
    Sheth, Sindu
    Linh Ho
    Wassef, Heidi
    Henderson, Robert
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53
  • [4] PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Head and Neck Cancers Including Thyroid Cancer
    Mihailovic, Jasna
    Killeen, Ronan P.
    Duignan, John A.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) : 419 - 440
  • [5] PET/CT Limitations and Pitfalls in Urogenital Cancers
    Vasireddi, Anil
    Nguyen, Nghi C.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (06) : 611 - 620
  • [6] PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma
    Aide, Nicolas
    Iravani, Amir
    Prigent, Kevin
    Kottler, Diane
    Alipour, Ramin
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Normal Variants and Pitfalls in Cardiac PET/CT
    Singh, Vasvi
    Dorbala, Sharmila
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) : 441 - 457
  • [8] PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma
    Nicolas Aide
    Amir Iravani
    Kevin Prigent
    Diane Kottler
    Ramin Alipour
    Rodney J. Hicks
    Cancer Imaging, 22
  • [9] Variants and Pitfalls of PET/CT in Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Imperiale, Alessio
    Meuter, Leah
    Pacak, Karel
    Taieb, David
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) : 519 - 528
  • [10] FDG PET–CT of gynecologic cancers: pearls and pitfalls
    Hima B. Prabhakar
    Jessica J. Kraeft
    John O. Schorge
    James A. Scott
    Susanna I. Lee
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 2472 - 2485