Energy scenarios: Toward a new energy paradigm

被引:36
|
作者
Devezas, Tessaleno [1 ]
LePoire, David [2 ]
Matias, Joao C. O. [1 ]
Silva, Abilio M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior, Fac Engn, P-6200001 Covilha, Portugal
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Primary energy sources exhibited regular long-term logistic substitution trends from the mid-19th century through the third quarter of the 20th century. This analysis, based on an extension of the Fisher-Pry substitution model, accounted for the observed historical shifts of primary energy use from sources of wood, coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear. In the mid-1980s the substitution dynamics was replaced by a relatively constant contribution from oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear power, and hydropower. However, a major factor in energy use dynamics in this recent period was substitution of conservation and efficiency for actual fuel use. The energy efficiency is measured as the ratio of economic activity to the rate of energy use (energy intensity). To incorporate these data into the logistic analysis, a method for estimating the fraction of energy saved by the increased efficiency was used. With this interpretation, energy efficiency fits within the substitution model. Furthermore, to identify indications of future energy scenarios, as well as to test the logistic substitution analysis, another statistical approach using ternary diagrams was developed. The consistent results from both logistic substitution and statistical analysis are compared with recent energy projections, trends in decarbonization, Kondratieff waves, and other efficiency measures. While the specific future mix of renewables and nuclear energy sources is uncertain, the more general logistic dynamics pattern of the energy system seems to be continuing as it has for about 150 years now. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distributed Generation Toward a New Energy Paradigm
    Guerrero, Josep M.
    Blaabjerg, Frede
    Zhelev, Toshko
    Hemmes, Kas
    Monmasson, Eric
    Jemei, Samir
    Comech, Maria P.
    Granadino, Ramon
    Frau, Juan I.
    IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2010, 4 (01) : 52 - 64
  • [2] The New Energy Paradigm
    Bhattacharyya, Subhes
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 (02) : 222 - 224
  • [3] The new paradigm for energy
    Reddy, AKN
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (03): : 258 - 259
  • [4] TOWARD A NEW ENERGY PARADIGM IN GEOGRAPHY: REVISITING THE CURRICULUM AND TEACHING PRACTICES
    Mazeikiene, Natalija
    Norkute, Odeta
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 12 (01): : 131 - 150
  • [5] The assessment: The new energy paradigm
    Helm, D
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2005, 21 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [6] Energy: territory and new landscapes scenarios
    Treu M.C.
    City, Territory and Architecture, 5 (1)
  • [7] Usage of Coal in the Paradigm Shift toward Sustainable Energy
    Park, Jay Hyun
    Yang, In Jae
    Lee, Jin Soo
    Lee, Cheong Ryong
    ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2020, 53 (06): : 793 - 807
  • [8] Macroprotections for Microgrids Toward a New Protection Paradigm Subsequent to Distributed Energy Resource Integration
    Teimourzadeh, Saeed
    Aminifar, Farrokh
    Davarpanah, Mahdi
    Guerrero, Josep M.
    IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2016, 10 (03) : 6 - 18
  • [9] SAVING ENERGY THROUGH BETTER INFORMATION: A NEW ENERGY PARADIGM?
    Bernstein, Mark
    Collins, Myles
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 32 (01) : 219 - 229
  • [10] New Energy Paradigm and Renewable Energy: Turkey's Vision
    Saygin, Hasan
    Cetin, Fusun
    INSIGHT TURKEY, 2010, 12 (03) : 107 - 128