The need for formal reflexivity in conservation science

被引:22
|
作者
Boyce, Paul [1 ]
Bhattacharyya, Jonaki [2 ]
Linklater, Wayne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Biol, Collaborat Sci Res Bldg,112 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Environm Studies, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
关键词
controversy; feral horses; invasive species; normative values; paradigms; rewilding; values; FREE-ROAMING HORSES; FERAL HORSE; RESTORATION; ECOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; WILD; COMMUNITIES; CONTROVERSY; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13840
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Conservation issues are often complicated by sociopolitical controversies that reflect competing philosophies and values regarding natural systems, animals, and people. Effective conservation outcomes require managers to engage myriad influences (social, cultural, political, and economic, as well as ecological). The contribution of conservation scientists who generate the information on which solutions rely is constrained if they are unable to acknowledge how personal values and disciplinary paradigms influence their research and conclusions. Conservation challenges involving controversial species provide an opportunity to reflect on the paradigms and value systems that underpin the discipline and practice of conservation science. Recent analyses highlight the ongoing reliance on normative values in conservation. We frame our discussion around controversies over feral horses (Equus ferus caballus) in the Canadian West and New Zealand and suggest that a lack of transparency and reflexivity regarding normative values continues to prevent conservation practitioners from finding resilient conservation solutions. We suggest that growing scrutiny and backlash to many normative conservation objectives necessitates formal reflexivity methods in conservation biology research, similar to those required of researchers in social science disciplines. Moreover, given that much conservation research and action continues to prioritize Western normative values regarding nature and conservation, we suggest that adopting reflexive methods more broadly is an important step toward more socially just research and practice. Formalizing such methods and requiring reflexivity in research will not only encourage reflection on how personal and disciplinary value systems influence conservation work but could more effectively engage people with diverse perspectives and values in conservation and encourage more novel and resilient conservation outcomes, particularly when dealing with controversial species.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The need for improved reflexivity in conservation science
    Montana, Jasper
    Elliott, Lindsey
    Ryan, Melanie
    Wyborn, Carina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 47 (04) : 217 - 219
  • [2] The application of reflexivity for conservation science
    Beck, Jacalyn M.
    Elliott, Kevin C.
    Booher, Charlie R.
    Renn, Kristen A.
    Montgomery, Robert A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 262
  • [3] A primer for the practice of reflexivity in conservation science
    Kaechele, Nicole
    Beveridge, Rachelle
    Adams, Megan
    Boyce, Paul
    Artelle, Kyle
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2024,
  • [4] Beyond "beyond GDP indicators:" The need for reflexivity in science for governance
    Kovacic, Zora
    Giampietro, Mario
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2015, 21 : 53 - 61
  • [5] Science of science and reflexivity
    Collins, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 2005, 11 (03) : 627 - 627
  • [6] Science of science and reflexivity
    Gingras, Yves
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2006, 42 (04) : 407 - 409
  • [7] Science of science and reflexivity
    Gieryn, TF
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2006, 35 (02) : 185 - 187
  • [8] Science of science and reflexivity
    Carroll, Patrick
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 2006, 85 (01) : 583 - 585
  • [9] Conservation science training: the need for an extra dimension
    Fisher, Brendan
    Balmford, Andrew
    Green, Rhys E.
    Trevelyan, Rosie
    [J]. ORYX, 2009, 43 (03) : 361 - 363
  • [10] The need for a more inclusive science of elephant conservation
    Cassidy, Lin
    Salerno, Jonathan
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2020, 13 (05):