Transient and Steady State Auditory Responses With Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation

被引:0
|
作者
Verhaert, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Hofmann, Michael [1 ]
Wouters, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ExpORL, Dept Neurosci, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Leuven, Belgium
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2015年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
Acoustic hearing implant; Auditory brainstem response; Auditory steady state response; Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation; Electrophysiology; Mixed hearing loss; Objective measures; BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE; MODULATED TONES; HEARING-LOSS; IMPLANT; THRESHOLDS; LATENCY; OTOSCLEROSIS; STIMULUS; PHASE; AGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Direct acoustic cochlear implants directly stimulate the cochlear fluid of the inner ear by means of a stapes piston driven by an actuator and show encouraging speech understanding in noise results for patients with severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Auditory evoked potentials recorded in such patients would allow for the objective evaluation of the aided auditory pathway. The aim of this study was (1) to develop a stimulation setup for EEG recordings in subjects with direct acoustic cochlear implants, (2) to show the feasibility of recording auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and auditory steady state responses (ASSRs), and (3) to analyze the relation between electrophysiological thresholds derived from these responses and behavioral thresholds. Design: For the three subjects implanted during a phase Ib clinical study in the authors' center, ABRs and 40 and 80 Hz ASSRs were recorded with a straightforward acoustic stimulation setup and a newly developed direct stimulation setup. Click trains with rates around 40 Hz and around 90 Hz were used as stimuli. By comparing amplitude growth function and phase delay in the same stimulus range, validity of the responses was confirmed. Results: With the acoustic stimulation setup, stimulation artifacts made it impossible to analyze responses. With the direct stimulation setup, stimulation artifacts could be removed completely and responses could be successfully recorded in a noninvasive manner in all subjects. Response properties such as ABR peak V latencies and ASSR apparent latencies were similar to those for acoustic stimulation, with apparent latencies of 39.9 and 24.7 msec for 40 and 90 Hz, respectively. Electrophysiological thresholds could be objectively determined from the ABRs and ASSRs. In the 40 Hz range, the mean difference between electrophysiological ASSR thresholds and behavioral ones was 12 dB. Conclusion: The results show that auditory evoked potential measurements with the developed direct stimulation setup are feasible and meaningful and should be further investigated to provide intraoperative feedback about the coupling of the actuator to the inner ear.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 329
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts
    Gransier, Robin
    Deprez, Hanne
    Hofmann, Michael
    Moonen, Marc
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 335 : 149 - 160
  • [2] Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users
    Hofmann, Michael
    Wouters, Jan
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 11 (02): : 267 - 282
  • [3] Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users
    Michael Hofmann
    Jan Wouters
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2010, 11 : 267 - 282
  • [4] COCHLEAR IMPLANT ARTIFACT REJECTION IN ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES
    Deprez, Hanne
    Hofmann, Michael
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    Moonen, Marc
    2014 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2014, : 1995 - 1999
  • [5] Are auditory steady-state responses a good tool prior to pediatric cochlear implantation?
    de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino
    Grasel, Signe Schuster
    Ramos, Henrique Faria
    de Almeida, Edigar Rezende
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    de Brito, Rubens
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 79 (08) : 1257 - 1262
  • [6] The prediction of hearing thresholds with auditory steady-state responses for cochlear implanted children
    Yang, Chao-Hui
    Chen, Hsiao-Chuan
    Hwang, Chung-Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 72 (05) : 609 - 617
  • [7] Characterization of cochlear implant artifacts in electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses
    Deprez, Hanne
    Gransier, Robin
    Hofmann, Michael
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    Moonen, Marc
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2017, 31 : 127 - 138
  • [8] On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?
    Muehler, R.
    HNO, 2012, 60 (05) : 421 - 426
  • [9] Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing
    Luke, Robert
    De Vos, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 147 : 568 - 576
  • [10] Hemispheric Asymmetry of Auditory Steady-State Responses to Monaural and Diotic Stimulation
    Hanne Poelmans
    Heleen Luts
    Maaike Vandermosten
    Pol Ghesquière
    Jan Wouters
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2012, 13 : 867 - 876