The Promotion of Sustainable Development Principles Through the Design Review Process. The Case of the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel

被引:0
|
作者
Morrison, Nicky [1 ]
Honegger, Lidija [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Planning, Penrith, Australia
[2] WSP UK Ltd, London, England
关键词
Sustainable development; design governance; design review panels; Cambridgeshire Quality Panel; community; connectivity; climate; character; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1080/14649357.2022.2050282
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The quest to deliver sustainable development has led to a search for ways to engage all stakeholders in this collective endeavour. Currently, local planners across England and elsewhere use independent design review panels to help raise the design quality of new developments. This paper examines the extent to which such panels can instill the need to adhere to sustainable development principles. We focus on the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel, which has framed its review process around sustainable development principles, named the "4 Cs": community, connectivity, climate, and character. Situating the panel's work within a design governance framework, we scrutinise the value and limitations of this particular governance tool. We conclude that local planners' ability to take forward the panel's recommendations on delivering new developments to high sustainability standards remains problematic, compromised by national priorities and market decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 348
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Promotion of Sustainable Development Principles Through the Design Review Process: The Case of the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel
    Morrison, Nicky
    Honeggar, Lidija
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (04) : 603 - 603
  • [2] Quality criteria for process design in the design process - industrial case studies and an expert panel
    Herder, PM
    Weijnen, MPC
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 22 : S513 - S520
  • [3] Olaparib Process Development Employing Quality by Design (QbD) Principles
    Manda, Amarendhar
    Komati, Shravan Kumar
    Nariyam, Sekhar Munaswamy
    Annapurna, Sasikala Cheemalapati Venkata
    Senadi, Gopal Chandru
    Maruthapillai, Arthanareeswari
    Bandichhor, Rakeshwar
    ACS OMEGA, 2024, 9 (28): : 30327 - 30349
  • [4] Incorporating sustainable development principles into building design: a review from a structural perspective including case study
    Miller, Dane
    Doh, Jeung-Hwan
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2015, 24 (06): : 421 - 439
  • [5] The Promotion of Sustainable Development through Trade Instruments in the EU: Case Study for Ukraine
    Malolitneva, Vesta
    Dzhabrailov, Ruslan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 7 (02): : 165 - 174
  • [6] A Review on Sustainable Design and Optimum Assembly Process: A Case Study on a Drone
    Zhafri, Z. M.
    Effendi, M. S. M.
    Rosli, Muhamad Farizuan
    GREEN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE: ADVANCED AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS, 2018, 2030
  • [7] The promotion of sustainable development through co-operation: a case for the creation of a global environmental organization?
    Scholtz, W.
    TYDSKRIF VIR DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE REG, 2006, (04) : 651 - 664
  • [8] Sustainable regional development through knowledge networks: Review of case studies
    Abdol Aziz Shahraki
    Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2019, 8 (04) : 471 - 482
  • [9] Sustainable regional development through knowledge networks: Review of case studies
    Shahraki, Abdol Aziz
    FRONTIERS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (04) : 471 - 482
  • [10] Development and Characterization of a Cell Culture Manufacturing Process Using Quality by Design (QbD) Principles
    Marasco, Daniel M.
    Gao, Jinxin
    Griffiths, Kristi
    Froggatt, Christopher
    Wang, Tongtong
    Wei, Gan
    MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURES FOR BIOLOGICS MANUFACTURING, 2014, 139 : 93 - 121