Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return

被引:31
|
作者
Vivas, AB
Fuentes, LJ
机构
[1] Liberal Studies, Affiliated Inst Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Salonika 54624, Greece
[2] Univ Almeria, Almeria, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03196167
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
In previous research, we have shown that the processing of targets that are presented to locations subject to inhibition of return (IOR) is affected by an inhibitory tagging mechanism. This mechanism acts by disconnecting activated representations of stimuli at inhibited locations from their associated responses. In two experiments, we assessed whether this inhibitory tagging mechanism of visual attention is also applied to task-irrelevant but prepotent dimensions of target stimuli, such as words in the Stroop task. To test this hypothesis, we examined the Stroop effect in an IOR procedure. The results showed that (1) IOR can be found in a color discrimination task, (2) the Stroop interference was reduced (Experiment 1) or eliminated (Experiment 2) when stimuli appeared at cued locations, as compared with cases in which they were presented at uncued locations, and (3) the effect of inhibitory tagging was limited to the shortest stimulus onset asynchrony value, replicating previous findings. These results agree with the idea that inhibitory tagging, occurring in IOR, affects the efficiency with which color words compete for responses in Stroop-like situations.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return
    Ana B. Vivas
    Luis J. Fuentes
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 : 315 - 323
  • [2] Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word is affected in inhibition of return
    Vivas, AB
    Estevez, AF
    Fuentes, LJ
    Humphreys, GW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 100 - 100
  • [3] Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: Evidence from stroop task
    Fuentes, LJ
    Boucart, M
    Vivas, AB
    Alvarez, R
    Zimmerman, MA
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 134 - 140
  • [4] Inhibition of Return and Stroop Effect in Spatial Attention
    Fu, Jia
    [J]. EMERGING RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 237 : 155 - 160
  • [5] The Influence of Flanker Interference on Inhibition of Return
    Liu, Xingjuan
    Tang, Xiaoyu
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (ICMA), 2013, : 1755 - 1759
  • [6] Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference
    Theeuwes, J
    Godijn, R
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (12) : 1485 - 1492
  • [7] Interference and cognitive inhibition in children with ADHD using stroop task
    Shin, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 48 (03) : 171 - 181
  • [8] The global precedence effect is not affected in inhibition of return
    Fuentes, LJ
    Vivas, AB
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 12 (04): : 472 - 488
  • [9] Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance
    Riedel, P.
    Wolff, M.
    Spreer, M.
    Petzold, J.
    Plawecki, M. H.
    Goschke, T.
    Zimmermann, U. S.
    Smolka, M. N.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 238 (06) : 1593 - 1607
  • [10] Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance
    P. Riedel
    M. Wolff
    M. Spreer
    J. Petzold
    M. H. Plawecki
    T. Goschke
    U. S. Zimmermann
    M. N. Smolka
    [J]. Psychopharmacology, 2021, 238 : 1593 - 1607