Prediction-Corrected Visual Predictive Checks for Diagnosing Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models

被引:1094
|
作者
Bergstrand, Martin [1 ]
Hooker, Andrew C. [1 ]
Wallin, Johan E. [1 ,2 ]
Karlsson, Mats O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Lilly PKPD&TS, Windlesham, Surrey, England
来源
AAPS JOURNAL | 2011年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
mixed-effects modeling; model diagnostics; pcVPC; prediction correction; VPC; NONMEM; PSN;
D O I
10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Informative diagnostic tools are vital to the development of useful mixed-effects models. The Visual Predictive Check (VPC) is a popular tool for evaluating the performance of population PK and PKPD models. Ideally, a VPC will diagnose both the fixed and random effects in a mixed-effects model. In many cases, this can be done by comparing different percentiles of the observed data to percentiles of simulated data, generally grouped together within bins of an independent variable. However, the diagnostic value of a VPC can be hampered by binning across a large variability in dose and/or influential covariates. VPCs can also be misleading if applied to data following adaptive designs such as dose adjustments. The prediction-corrected VPC (pcVPC) offers a solution to these problems while retaining the visual interpretation of the traditional VPC. In a pcVPC, the variability coming from binning across independent variables is removed by normalizing the observed and simulated dependent variable based on the typical population prediction for the median independent variable in the bin. The principal benefit with the pcVPC has been explored by application to both simulated and real examples of PK and PKPD models. The investigated examples demonstrate that pcVPCs have an enhanced ability to diagnose model misspecification especially with respect to random effects models in a range of situations. The pcVPC was in contrast to traditional VPCs shown to be readily applicable to data from studies with a priori and/or a posteriori dose adaptations.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 151
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction-Corrected Visual Predictive Checks for Diagnosing Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
    Martin Bergstrand
    Andrew C. Hooker
    Johan E. Wallin
    Mats O. Karlsson
    [J]. The AAPS Journal, 2011, 13 : 143 - 151
  • [2] Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models
    Mentre, France
    Escolano, Sylvie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 345 - 367
  • [3] Prediction Discrepancies for the Evaluation of Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
    France Mentré
    Sylvie Escolano
    [J]. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2006, 33 : 345 - 367
  • [4] Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling: Individualization and prediction
    Olofsen, E
    Dinges, DF
    Van Dongen, HPA
    [J]. AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 75 (03): : A134 - A140
  • [5] Randomly Truncated Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
    Carolina Costa Mota Paraíba
    Carlos Alberto Ribeiro Diniz
    [J]. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2016, 21 : 295 - 313
  • [6] Randomly Truncated Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
    Mota Paraiba, Carolina Costa
    Ribeiro Diniz, Carlos Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2016, 21 (02) : 295 - 313
  • [7] Influence analyses of nonlinear mixed-effects models
    Lee, SY
    Xu, L
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2004, 45 (02) : 321 - 341
  • [8] Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models for PET Data
    Chen, Yakuan
    Goldsmith, Jeff
    Ogden, R. Todd
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 (03) : 881 - 891
  • [9] Bayesian truncated beta nonlinear mixed-effects models
    Mota Paraiba, Carolina Costa
    Bochkina, Natalia
    Ribeiro Diniz, Carlos Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 320 - 346
  • [10] Semiparametric nonlinear mixed-effects models and their applications - Comment
    Lin, XH
    Zhang, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (456) : 1288 - 1291