Life-Cycle Cost Evaluation of Conventional and Corrosion-Resistant Steel for Bridges

被引:48
|
作者
Soliman, Mohamed [1 ]
Frangopol, Dan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Adv Technol Large Struct Syst ATLSS Engn Res Ctr, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
关键词
Steel bridges; Life cycles; Corrosion; Maintenance cost; Sustainability; ORIENTED MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DETERIORATING STRUCTURES; MULTIPLE HAZARDS; MAINTENANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000647
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel bridges that are under severe chloride exposure due to deicing salts or marine environmental effects require frequent maintenance and repair activities to extend their service life and maintain an adequate performance level. In addition to the direct maintenance cost, these maintenance actions may lead to indirect costs associated with traffic delays and environmental effects that can significantly increase the life-cycle cost of the bridge under consideration. The use of more sustainable materials, such as maintenance-free steel, may increase the initial cost of the structure; however, the life-cycle cost, including the maintenance actions during the service life and their associated indirect effects, can be significantly reduced. This paper presents the computational approach and results of an analytical investigation to quantify the life-cycle cost of a steel bridge constructed using conventional painted carbon steel and to compare this cost to that of the same bridge constructed using maintenance-free steel. Indirect environmental, social, and economic impacts of maintenance actions are computed to quantify the sustainability metrics associated with steel bridges during their life cycle. The approach is illustrated using an existing bridge located in Pennsylvania. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000647. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle cost analysis of steel bridges under severe chloride exposure: A comparison between conventional and corrosion-resistant steel
    Soliman, M.
    Frangopol, D. M.
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 2390 - 2395
  • [2] Life-Cycle Cost Comparison of Corrosion Management Strategies for Steel Bridges
    Kere, Kiswendsida J.
    Huang, Qindan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (04)
  • [3] Optimum maintenance of deteriorated steel bridges using corrosion resistant steel based on system reliability and life-cycle cost
    Han, Xu
    Yang, David Y.
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 243
  • [4] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING PROMOTES USE OF CORROSION-RESISTANT ALLOYS
    Grubb, John
    Rakowski, James
    [J]. TOWARDS MATERIALS RESOURCE SUSTAINABILITY (REWAS 2016), 2016, : 209 - 214
  • [5] Life-Cycle Cost Analyses of a New Steel for Bridges
    Okasha, Nader M.
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    Fletcher, Fred B.
    Wilson, Alex D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2012, 17 (01) : 168 - 172
  • [6] Life-cycle seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges considering corrosion of steel reinforcement
    Ou, Y. -C.
    Delima, A. B.
    Cute, L.
    [J]. BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT, RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, : 995 - 1002
  • [7] Risk-based life-cycle optimization of deteriorating steel bridges: Investigation on the use of novel corrosion resistant steel
    Han, Xu
    Yang, David Y.
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (08) : 1668 - 1686
  • [8] Life-cycle cost-effective optimum design of steel bridges
    Lee, KM
    Cho, HN
    Choi, YM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2004, 60 (11) : 1585 - 1613
  • [9] Life-cycle cost management of concrete bridges
    So, K. K. L.
    Cheung, M. M. S.
    Zhang, E. X. Q.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 162 (03) : 103 - 117
  • [10] Life-cycle cost estimation of a new metal spraying system for steel bridges
    Kondo, T.
    Okuno, S.
    [J]. BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT, RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, : 3338 - 3343