Can artificial waterways provide a refuge for fioodplain biodiversity? A case study from North Western Germany

被引:19
|
作者
Harvolk, S. [1 ]
Symmank, L. [2 ]
Sundermeier, A. [2 ]
Otte, A. [1 ]
Donath, T. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Inst Landscape Ecol & Resource Management, Res Ctr Biosyst Land Use & Nutr IFZ, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] German Fed Inst Hydrol BfG, D-56068 Koblenz, Germany
关键词
Dortmund-Ems canal; Vegetation; Landscape structure; Novel ecosystem; Functionality; Regression tree; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; LAND-USE; PLANT-COMMUNITIES; RIVER; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.024
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rivers and floodplains are among the most species-rich ecosystems in Middle Europe. Intensive anthropogenic influence has led to a loss of floodplain area and threatens their ecological functionality. This is especially the case for waterways, which have been subject to river engineering due to their economic importance and thus have lost a significant amount of their original floodplains and biodiversity. Canals as artificial waterways have been in the focus of reconciliation ecology, and they have been proven to serve as a refuge for several aquatic species groups where their original habitat is impaired or lost. However, the potential to preserve terrestrial macrophytes and biodiversity along their banks has rarely been considered. Thus the question arises whether canals can provide, at least partly, suitable habitat space to sustain species diversity and functionality of floodplains. In the present case study, we compared the floristic, functional and structural diversity of the floodplain and the respective adjacent areas of the river Ems and the Dortmund-Ems canal in North Western Germany, since both waterways run in parallel and are hydrologically connected. Species composition shows distinct differences between both waterways. Most species along the canal are mainly generalists adapted to anthropogenic influence, while species along the river are characteristic for floodplain systems. Species diversity is up to 10% higher along the canal due to higher lateral heterogeneity, while functional divergence and landscape structure diversity are up to 5% higher along the natural river. Diversity distribution patterns are mainly influenced by landscape structure and land use patterns. Numbers of endangered species did not differ significantly. Thus, the canal can serve as a habitat for single endangered floodplain species but it cannot substitute the functions of a natural dynamic floodplain. Increasing structural diversity and preserving the habitat function of the canal banks by an adapted management regime might enhance the ecological value of a heavily used artificial waterway within the given economic limitations. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 44
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biodiversity offsetting can relocate nature away from people: An empirical case study in Western Australia
    Kalliolevo, Hanna
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Sharma, Roshan
    Bull, Joseph W.
    Bekessy, Sarah A.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (10)
  • [2] Habitat rehabilitation for juvenile fish in urban waterways: A case study from Berlin, Germany
    Weber, A.
    Wolter, C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY, 2017, 33 (01) : 136 - 143
  • [3] North-west Africa as a source and refuge area of plant biodiversity: a case study on Campanula kremeri and Campanula occidentalis
    Garcia-Aloy, Sara
    Vitales, Daniel
    Roquet, Cristina
    Sanmartin, Isabel
    Vargas, Pablo
    Molero, Julian
    Kamau, Peris
    Jose Aldasoro, Juan
    Alarcon, Marisa
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2017, 44 (09) : 2057 - 2068
  • [4] How much energy autonomy can decentralised photovoltaic generation provide? A case study for Southern Germany
    Kuehnbach, Matthias
    Pisula, Stefan
    Bekk, Anke
    Weidlich, Anke
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 280
  • [5] Can Regional Organic Agriculture Feed the Regional Community? A Case Study for Hamburg and North Germany
    Joseph, Sarah
    Peters, Irene
    Friedrich, Hanno
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 164
  • [6] Reviving wood-pastures for biodiversity and people: A case study from western Estonia
    Roellig, Marlene
    Sutcliffe, Laura M. E.
    Sammul, Marek
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    Newig, Jens
    Fischer, Joern
    AMBIO, 2016, 45 (02) : 185 - 195
  • [7] Reviving wood-pastures for biodiversity and people: A case study from western Estonia
    Marlene Roellig
    Laura M. E. Sutcliffe
    Marek Sammul
    Henrik von Wehrden
    Jens Newig
    Joern Fischer
    Ambio, 2016, 45 : 185 - 195
  • [8] Linking regional and landscape scales for assessing biodiversity: A case study from Western Ghats
    Nagendra, H
    Gadgil, M
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1998, 75 (03): : 264 - 271
  • [9] Spatial interpolation of carbon stock: a case study from the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, India
    Joseph, Shijo
    Reddy, Ch. Sudhakar
    Thomas, A. P.
    Srivastava, S. K.
    Srivastava, V. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06): : 481 - 486
  • [10] Biodiversity of bryophytes growing on the faeces of ungulates - a case study from north-eastern Poland
    Jaroszewicz, Bogdan
    Sondej, Izabela
    Stebel, Adam
    Proznikow, Ewa
    Kwiatkowska-Falinska, Anna J.
    CRYPTOGAMIE BRYOLOGIE, 2011, 32 (03) : 221 - 231