The implications of stakeholder perspective for LCA of wasted food and green waste

被引:52
|
作者
Oldfield, Thomas L. [1 ]
White, Eoin [2 ]
Holden, Nicholas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Biosyst & Food Engn, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] Orbas Consulting, Training & Res, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Compost; Circular economy; Life cycle assessment; Waste valorization; Nutrient recovery; Zero-burden-assumption; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; CRADLE-TO-CRADLE; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; BIOSOLARIZATION; VALORIZATION; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; EASEWASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.239
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The principles of the circular economy are transforming how we view waste materials. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to quantify the environmental impacts of waste management has been subject to assumptions and approaches that influence the interpretation of results. This study analyzed the implications of the transition from a linear economy where waste is valueless and managed for disposal to a circular 'cradle-to-cradle' economy where waste is valorized as a resource. A LCA study was carried out viewed from two stakeholder perspectives (i) waste disposal; and (ii) waste valorization by nutrient recovery. The composting of two domestic wastes was considered: wasted food and green (garden) waste. For the waste disposal perspective the zero-burden-assumption was adopted and a functional unit of kg waste was used. For the waste valorization perspective the upstream impact was included and a downstream functional unit of kg available nitrogen (N) was used. From the waste disposal perspective using a functional unit of kg waste, composting caused less impact than landfill. However, from the nutrient recovery perspective using a functional unit of kg available N, the business as-usual synthetic fertilizer system had the lowest impact. This was because of the upstream impact of producing and processing food. How waste is perceived, and the subsequent assumptions and methodological choices made at the goal and scope stage of an LCA have a significant impact on the results and interpretations of an LCA study. When the focus of a system is waste valorization in a circular economy, a functional unit of per kg waste is not appropriate. It was concluded that to properly determine the impacts of valorizing waste materials in the circular economy, the upstream impacts must be considered and a functional unit that reflects the function of the downstream, secondary processing is required. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1554 / 1564
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wasted Food, Wasted Energy: The Embedded Energy in Food Waste in the United States
    Cuellar, Amanda D.
    Webber, Michael E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (16) : 6464 - 6469
  • [2] The role of collaboration in tackling food loss and waste: Salient stakeholder perspective
    Surucu-Balci, Ebru
    Tuna, Okan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 367
  • [3] Food waste conversion options in Singapore: Environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective
    Khoo, Hsien H.
    Lim, Teik Z.
    Tan, Reginald B. H.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (06) : 1367 - 1373
  • [4] Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial by-products
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    Winkler, Ralph
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (12) : 3026 - 3033
  • [5] Wasted Food, Wasted Resources? A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Analysis of Food Loss and Waste Generation and Treatment
    Xue, Li
    Song, Guobao
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (17) : 7240 - 7255
  • [6] Stakeholder involvement in Australian paper and packaging waste management LCA study
    James, KL
    Grant, T
    Sonneveld, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (03): : 151 - 157
  • [7] Stakeholder involvement in australian paper and packaging waste management LCA study
    Karli L. James
    Tim Grant
    Kees Sonneveld
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 : 151 - 157
  • [8] Hopefully that?s not wasted! The role of hope for reducing food waste
    Khalil, Mary
    Northey, Gavin
    Septianto, Felix
    Lang, Bodo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 147 : 59 - 70
  • [9] LCA analysis of food waste co-digestion
    Bartocci, Pietro
    Zampilli, Mauro
    Liberti, Federica
    Pistolesi, Valentina
    Massoli, Sara
    Bidini, Gianni
    Fantozzi, Francesco
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 709
  • [10] Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective
    Fruergaard, T.
    Astrup, T.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (03) : 572 - 582