Modified suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical comparison

Purpose Displaced tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide an adequate bone healing and to avoid a loss of posterior stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a recently established modified suture bridge technique to a well-established transtibial pullout technique. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a transtibial pullout fixation. Methods Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an uniaxial hydrodynamic material testing system. A standardized bony avulsion fracture of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: (A) suture bridge configuration and (B) transtibial pullout fixation. In 90 degrees of flexion elongation, initial stiffness and failure load were determined. Results The suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 +/- 2.1 mm) than transtibial pullout technique (12.4 +/- 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 46.9 +/- 3.9 N/mm in group A und 40.8 +/- 9.0 N/mm in group B (p = 0.194). Load to failure testing exhibited 286.8 +/- 88.3 N in group A and 234.3 +/- 96.8 N in group B (p = 0.377). Conclusion The suture bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading. But postoperative rehabilitation must respect the low construct strength of both techniques because both fixation techniques did not show a sufficient fixation strength to allow for a more aggressive rehabilitation.