3D/Biela and the andromedids: Fragmenting versus sublimating comets

被引:23
|
作者
Jenniskens, P.
Vaubaillon, J.
机构
[1] SETI Inst, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[2] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
来源
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 134卷 / 03期
关键词
comets : individual ( 3D/ Biela); meteors; meteoroids; minor planets; asteroids;
D O I
10.1086/519074
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Comet 3D/ Biela broke up in 1842/1843 and continued to disintegrate in the returns of 1846 and 1852. When meteor storms were observed in November of 1872 and 1885, it was surmised that those showers were the debris from that breakup. This could have come from one of two sources: ( 1) the initial separation of fragments near aphelion or ( 2) the continued disintegration of the fragments afterward. Alternatively, the meteoroids could simply have come from water vapor drag when the fragments approached perihelion ( option 3). We investigated the source of the Andromedid storms by calculating the dynamical evolution of dust ejected in a normal manner by water vapor drag in the returns from 1703 to 1866, assuming that the comet would have remained similarly active over each return. In addition, we simulated the isotropic ejection of dust during the initial fragmentation event at aphelion in December of 1842. We conclude that option 2 is the most likely source of meteoroids encountered during the 1872 and 1885 storms, but this accounts for only a relatively small amount of mass lost in a typical comet breakup.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1045
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Miniaturizing the comet assay with 3D vertical comets
    Baert, P
    Van Oostveldt, P
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2003, 51A (01): : 26 - 34
  • [2] STEREO/HI - from near-Earth objects to 3D comets
    Davis, CJ
    Harrison, RA
    SOLAR ENCOUNTER, SOLAR-B AND STEREO, 2005, 36 (08): : 1524 - 1529
  • [3] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58
  • [4] Photogrammetry versus 3D scanner: producing 3D models of museums' artifacts
    Khries, Hashem Mohammad
    COLLECTION AND CURATION, 2021, 40 (04) : 153 - 157
  • [5] Crashing comets in 3-D
    Deitz, D
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 119 (10) : 26 - 26
  • [6] Magnetic fields near spacecraft-explored comets: 3D MHD numerical simulation
    Baranov, V. B.
    Alexashov, D. B.
    Lebedev, M. G.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 449 (03) : 2268 - 2273
  • [7] TESTING THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF 3D MODELS OF LONG BONES: MDCT VERSUS 3D SURFACE SCANNING
    Campana, Lorenzo
    Fahrni, Stella
    Grabherr, Silke
    Uldin, Tanya
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 277 : 3 - 4
  • [8] 3D or not 3D?
    Reidy, Heath
    PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 22 (13) : 37 - 38
  • [9] 3D or not 3D?
    Rockley, Ted
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2013, 219 (2928) : 31 - 31
  • [10] Accuracy and Time-Efficiency of 3D CT Colonography of Pig Phantoms: Conventional 3D Versus New Panoramic 3D Interpretation
    Choi, J.
    Kim, S.
    Choi, B.
    Han, J.
    Kim, S.
    Park, H.
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)