共 50 条
A voxel matching method for effective leaf area index estimation in temperate deciduous forests from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data
被引:31
|作者:
Zhu, Xi
[1
]
Liu, Jing
[1
,2
,3
]
Skidmore, Andrew K.
[1
,4
]
Premier, Joe
[5
]
Heurich, Marco
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Macquarie Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[5] Bavarian Forest Natl Pk, Freyunger Str 2, D-94481 Grafenau, Germany
[6] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Chair Wildlife Ecol & Management, Freiburg, Germany
基金:
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词:
Effective leaf area index;
Airborne LiDAR;
Leaf-off;
Leaf-on;
Voxel matching;
TERRESTRIAL LIDAR;
INDIVIDUAL TREES;
HIGH-RESOLUTION;
ANGLE DISTRIBUTION;
CROSS-VALIDATION;
GAP FRACTION;
CANOPY;
HEIGHT;
METRICS;
PLANT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.rse.2020.111696
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
The quantification of leaf area index (LAI) is essential for modeling the interaction between atmosphere and biosphere. The airborne LiDAR has emerged as an effective tool for mapping plant area index (PAI) in a landscape consisting of both woody and leaf materials. However, the discrimination between woody and leaf materials and the estimation of effective LAI (eLAI) have, to date, rarely been studied at landscape scale. We applied a voxel matching algorithm to estimate eLAI of deciduous forests using simulated and field LiDAR data under leaf-on and leaf-off conditions. We classified LiDAR points as either a leaf or a woody hit on leaf-on LiDAR data by matching the point with leaf-off data. We compared the eLAI result of our voxel matching algorithm against the subtraction method, where the leaf-off effective woody area index (eWAI) is subtracted from the effective leaf-on PAI (ePAI). Our results, which were validated against terrestrial LiDAR derived eLAI, showed that the voxel matching method, with an optimal voxel size of 0.1 m, produced an unbiased estimation of terrestrial LiDAR derived eLAI with an R-2 of 0.70 and an RMSE of 0.41 (RRMSE: 20.1%). The subtraction method, however, yielded an R-2 of 0.62 and an RMSE of 1.02 (RRMSE: 50.1%) with a significant underestimation of 0.94. Reassuringly, the same outcome was observed using a simulated dataset. In addition, we evaluated the performance of 96 LiDAR metrics under leaf-on conditions for eLAI prediction using a statistical model. Based on the importance scores derived from the random forest regression, nine of the 96 leaf-on LiDAR metrics were selected. Cross-validation showed that eLAI could be predicted using these metrics under leaf-on conditions with an R-2 of 0.73 and an RMSE of 0.27 (RRMSE: 17.4%). The voxel matching method yielded a slightly lower accuracy (R-2: 0.70, RMSE:0.41, RRMSE: 20.1%) than the statistical model. We, therefore, suggest that the voxel matching method offers a new opportunity for the estimating eLAI and other ecological applications that require the classification between leaf and woody materials using airborne LiDAR data. It potentially allows transferability to different sites and flight campaigns.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文