Polyphasic approach in fungal taxonomy

被引:0
|
作者
Gannibal, Ph B. [1 ]
机构
[1] All Russian Inst Plant Protect, Podbelskogo 3, St Petersburg 196608, Russia
来源
ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII | 2021年 / 82卷 / 03期
关键词
MASS-SPECTROMETRY; SPECIES CONCEPTS; FILAMENTOUS FUNGI; ALTERNARIA-DAUCI; RPB1; SEQUENCES; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; YEAST; PENICILLIUM;
D O I
10.31857/S0044459621020032
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Taxonomy of micromycetes continuously experienced a number of specific difficulties. Advances in molecular phylogeny were an important achievement for fungal taxonomy during the last two decades. Usage of multilocus sequencing in combination with phylogenetic analysis is technically convenient and methodologically reasonable for species delimitation. They work within the frames of evolutionary species concept which is the most popular in mycology now and obviously will save popularity in the nearest future. The most proper tool to define species boundaries is phylogenetic species recognition. However, this well -developed approach sometimes gives no opportunity to clearly recover biodiversity structure and then perform easy taxa identification. Arising in the 1970th in bacteriology, polyphasic taxonomy became in 2000th fairly popular in mycology. Nowadays it is comprehended as consensus taxonomy performing definition of taxa extension based on comparative analysis of all available characters. This approach is not absolutely new. Similar concepts have been utilized in mycology and other biological disciplines earlier. In the article we review the modern practice of polyphasic approach application in the mycology. A special part of the review is dedicated to diversity of features available for a mycologist and to appropriateness of their usage in taxonomy in particular within the scope of the polyphasic approach. This approach is reasonable to apply when phylogenetic recognition gives no satisfactory results, for instance, in case of insufficient number of sequenced loci or in case of analysis of recently diverged species. Furthermore, polyphasic approach is proper for making the taxonomic hypotheses to test them with phylogenetic methods and to create appropriate sample strain sets.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polyphasic Approach to Fungal Taxonomy
    Ph. B. Gannibal
    Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2022, 12 (1) : 18 - 28
  • [2] A polyphasic approach for the taxonomy of cyanobacteria: principles and applications
    Komarek, Jiri
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 2016, 51 (03) : 346 - 353
  • [3] Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics
    Vandamme, P
    Pot, B
    Gillis, M
    DeVos, P
    Kersters, K
    Swings, J
    MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1996, 60 (02) : 407 - +
  • [4] Polyphasic approach to the taxonomy of the Rhizopus stolonifer group
    Liou, Guey-Yuh
    Chen, Shyue-Ru
    Wei, Yu-Hui
    Lee, Fwu-Ling
    Fu, Hui-Mei
    Yuan, Gwo-Fang
    Stalpers, A.
    MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 111 : 196 - 203
  • [5] Polyphasic taxonomy
    Uilenberg, Gerrit
    Goff, Will L.
    IMPACT OF EMERGING ZOONOTIC DISEASES ON ANIMAL HEALTH, 2006, 1081 : 492 - 497
  • [6] Polyphasic taxonomy reveals numerous new fungal tree pathogens in the Cryphonectriaceae
    Gryzenhou, M.
    Wingfield, M. J.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2008, 74 (02) : 368 - 368
  • [7] Detection of deep fungal infections: a polyphasic approach
    Sabino, Raquel
    Simoes, Helena
    Verissimo, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 68 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [8] Prokaryotic taxonomy in the sequencing era - the polyphasic approach revisited
    Kaempfer, Peter
    Glaeser, Stefanie P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 14 (02) : 291 - 317
  • [9] A POLYPHASIC APPROACH TO THE TAXONOMY OF ORAL ASACCHAROLYTIC EUBACTERIUM SPECIES
    HIOM, S
    WADE, WG
    WEIGHTMAN, AJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 827 - 827
  • [10] A polyphasic approach to the taxonomy of Backusella reveals two new species
    Cordeiro, Thalline Rafhaella Leite
    Walther, Grit
    Lee, Hyang Burm
    Nguyen, Thuong Thuong Thi
    de Souza, Carlos Alberto Fragoso
    Lima, Diogo Xavier
    de Oliveira, Rafael Jose Vilela
    Goes-Neto, Aristoteles
    Tome, Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro
    Kurzai, Oliver
    Voigt, Kerstin
    de Azevedo Santiago, Andre Luiz Cabral Monteiro
    MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS, 2023, 22 (02)