共 50 条
Efficacy and safety of haloperidol for delirium prevention in adult patients: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
被引:13
|作者:
Chen, Zhen
[2
]
Chen, Rui
[3
]
Zheng, Donghua
[5
]
Su, Yongpeng
[2
]
Wen, Shuchao
[2
]
Guo, Huocheng
[2
]
Ye, Zhigang
[2
]
Deng, Yingxin
[1
]
Liu, Genglong
[6
]
Zuo, Liuer
[2
]
Wei, Xuxia
[4
]
Hou, Yunqi
[1
]
机构:
[1] Southern Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Shunde 1, Shunde Hosp, Dept Neurol, Foshan 528308, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Shunde 1, Shunde Hosp, Dept Intens Care Unit, Foshan 528308, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Gen Hosp Southern Theater Command, Dept Med Intens Care Unit, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Surg Intens Care Unit, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Intens Care Unit, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词:
Haloperidol;
Delirium;
Prevention;
Meta-analysis;
Trial sequential analysis;
CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS;
SUBSYNDROMAL DELIRIUM;
ELDERLY-PATIENTS;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PROPHYLAXIS;
SURGERY;
PLACEBO;
RISK;
IMPACT;
OLDER;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.09.017
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Study objective: To identify the efficacy and safety of haloperidol prophylaxis in adult patients with a high risk for delirium. Design: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Intervention: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, the ISI Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception through to March 2019.Citation screening, data abstraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. In addition, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of the body of evidence. Main results: We appraised 8 RCTs involving 3034 patients that that were in compliance with inclusion and exclusion criterion. Pooled analyses indicated patients receiving haloperidol prophylaxis and placebo or normal saline did not significantly differ in incidence of delirium (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] =- 0.70 to 1.15), with TSA inconclusive. Notably, compared with the control group, use of haloperidol significantly decreased the duration of delirium (Mean difference [MD] - 0.94; 95% CI - 1.82 to - 0.06 days), with a marked heterogeneity. Additionally, haloperidol prophylaxis does not significantly affect duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and mortality. In terms of safety profiles, haloperidol was not associated with increased risk for QTc prolongation, extrapyramidal symptoms, or adverse events. GRADE indicated the level of evidence was very low for a benefit from haloperidol prophylaxis. Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis suggested the use of prophylactic haloperidol compared with placebo had no beneficial impacts on incidence of delirium, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and mortality in adult patients. It appeared to have a positive effect on duration of delirium, while with a significant heterogeneity. These findings do not support the routine usage of haloperidol for delirium prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文