Willis v. Wu in the supreme court of South Carolina

被引：0

作者：

Bostrom, BA

机构：

来源：

ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE | 2005年 / 20卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

HELD: South Carolina does not recognize a common law cause of action for wrongful life brought by or on behalf of a child born with a congenital defect because it is impossible to prove that being terminated by elective abortion, and thus never being born, is better than being born and living a life with disabilities.

引用

页码：275 / 278

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Wrongful life: An issue of first impression for the Supreme Court of South Carolina - Willis v. Wu
Beshara, N
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2005, 33 (03): : 616 - 617
[2] Supreme Court v. unions
Bacon, D
[J]. NATION, 2002, 274 (19) : 6 - 7
[3] Ethics v. professionalism and the Louisiana Supreme Court
Smith, NG
[J]. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 58 (02): : 539 - 567
[4] SOUTH DAKOTA v. NORTH CAROLINA
不详
[J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1904, 4 (05) : 364 - 365
[5] Gonzales v. Raich in the supreme court of the United States
Bostrom, BA
[J]. ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2005, 21 (01) : 47 - 56
[6] Freelanced - The Supreme Court v. Lexis-Nexis
Rosen, J
[J]. NEW REPUBLIC, 2001, 225 (2-3) : 14 - +
[7] In the Supreme Court of Kentucky Woods v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Bostrom, BA
[J]. ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2004, 20 (02) : 185 - 192
[8] Preston v. Meriter Hospital in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Bostrom, BA
[J]. ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2005, 21 (02) : 139 - 144
[9] GARNER v. TEAMSTERS: THE SUPREME COURT AND PRIVATE RIGHTS
Rose, George
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1954, 40 (02) : 177 - 192
[10] US Supreme Court rules in Roe v. Wade
Hodak, George
[J]. ABA JOURNAL, 2007, 93 : 72 - 72

← 1 2 3 4 5 →