Full-field automated photoelasticity by Fourier polarimetry with three wavelengths

被引:13
|
作者
Berezhna, S
Berezhnyy, I
Takashi, M
Voloshin, A
机构
[1] Inst Phys Opt, UA-79005 Lvov, Ukraine
[2] Aoyama Gakuin Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1570071, Japan
[3] Lehigh Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mech, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1364/AO.40.000052
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The search for fast, precise, and robust testing techniques remains an important problem in automated full-field photoelasticity. The polarizer-sample-analyzer (PSA)-based three-wavelength polarimetric method presented here employs discrete Fourier analysis and a spectral content unwrapping algorithm to provide completely automatic, simple, fast, and accurate determination of both photoelastic parameters. Fourier analysis of experimental data and a three-wavelength approach reduce the effect of noise and efficiently cope with poor accuracy in regions of both isochromatic and isoclinic maps. Because any polarimetric technique yields the phase value in the principal range of the corresponding trigonometric function, the final step in data processing is phase unwrapping. Because of the good quality of the wrapped phase map and because each point is processed independently, our suggested three-wavelength unwrapping algorithm exhibits a high level of robustness. Unlike some other PSA three-wavelength techniques, the given algorithm here solves the problem of phase unwrapping completely. Specifically, it converts experimentally obtained arccosine-type phase maps directly into full phase value distributions, skipping the step of generating an arctangent-type ramped phase map and resorting to other unwrapping routines for final data processing. The accuracy of the new technique has been estimated with a Babinet-Soleil compensator. Test experiments with the disk in diametric compression and a quartz plate have proved that the technique can be used for precise determination of the isoclinic angle and relative retardation, even for large values of the latter. (C) 2001 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 100.5070, 100.2000, 100.2650, 120.5410, 260.1440, 350.4600.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 61
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Full-field automated photoelasticity by Fourier polarimetry with three wavelengths
    Berezhna, Svitlana
    Berezhnyy, Ihor
    Takashi, Masahisa
    Voloshin, Arkady
    [J]. Applied Optics, 2001, 40 (01): : 52 - 61
  • [2] TOWARDS RGB PHOTOELASTICITY - FULL-FIELD AUTOMATED PHOTOELASTICITY IN WHITE-LIGHT
    AJOVALASIT, A
    BARONE, S
    PETRUCCI, G
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1995, 35 (03) : 193 - 200
  • [3] Full-field automated photoelasticity by use of a three-wavelength approach to phase stepping
    Nurse, AD
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1997, 36 (23): : 5781 - 5786
  • [4] Two-wavelength method for full-field automated photoelasticity
    Plouzennec, N
    Lagarde, A
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1999, 39 (04) : 274 - 277
  • [5] Two-wavelength method for full-field automated photoelasticity
    N. Plouzennec
    A. Lagarde
    [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1999, 39 : 274 - 277
  • [6] Full-field stress determination in photoelasticity with phase shifting technique
    Guo, Enhai
    Liu, Yonggang
    Han, Yongsheng
    Arola, Dwayne
    Zhang, Dongsheng
    [J]. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (04)
  • [7] Digital full-field photoelasticity of tempered architectural glass: A review
    Dix, Steffen
    Schuler, Christian
    Kolling, Stefan
    [J]. OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 153
  • [8] Improvement of Fourier Polarimetry for applications in tomographic photoelasticity
    Yang, H.
    Gibson, S.
    Tomlinson, R. A.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2006, 46 (05) : 619 - 626
  • [9] Improvement of Fourier Polarimetry for Applications in Tomographic Photoelasticity
    H. Yang
    S. Gibson
    R. A. Tomlinson
    [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2006, 46 : 619 - 626
  • [10] New Method of Full-Field Stress Analysis and Measurement Using Photoelasticity
    Dijkstra, Jelke
    Broere, Wout
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2010, 33 (06): : 469 - 481