Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:343
|
作者
Orrow, Gillian [1 ]
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise [1 ]
Sanderson, Simon [1 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ Hlth, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EXERCISE-REFERRAL SCHEMES; ACTIVITY INTERVENTIONS; IMPROVE FITNESS; RISK; PRESCRIPTION; ADVICE; PEOPLE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.e1389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether trials of physical activity promotion based in primary care show sustained effects on physical activity or fitness in sedentary adults, and whether exercise referral interventions are more effective than other interventions. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists. Review methods Review of randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in sedentary adults recruited in primary care, with minimum follow-up of 12 months, reporting physical activity or fitness (or both) as outcomes, and using intention to treat analyses. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, appraised risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. Results We included 15 trials (n=8745). Most interventions took place in primary care, included health professionals in delivery, and involved advice or counselling given face to face or by phone (or both) on multiple occasions. Only three trials investigated exercise referral. In 13 trials presenting self reported physical activity, we saw small to medium positive intervention effects at 12 months (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.73; standardised mean difference 0.25, 0.11 to 0.38). The number needed to treat with an intervention for one additional sedentary adult to meet internationally recommended levels of activity at 12 months was 12 (7 to 33). In four trials reporting cardiorespiratory fitness, a medium positive effect at 12 months was non-significant (standardised mean difference 0.51, -0.18 to 1.20). Three trials of exercise referral found small non-significant effects on self reported physical activity at 12 months (odds ratio 1.38; 0.98 to 1.95; standardised mean difference 0.20, -0.21 to 0.61). Conclusions Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report. We found insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions. Primary care commissioners should consider these findings while awaiting further trial evaluation of exercise referral schemes and other primary care interventions, with longer follow-up and use of objective measures of outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of physical activity promotion and exercise referral in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Jean-Pierre Laake
    Joanna Fleming
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [2] Effectiveness of physical activity promotion and exercise referral in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Laake, Jean-Pierre
    Fleming, Joanna
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [3] Effectiveness of physical activity interventions delivered or prompted by health professionals in primary care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Kettle, Victoria E.
    Madigan, Claire D.
    Coombe, April
    Graham, Henrietta
    Thomas, Jonah J. C.
    Chalkley, Anna E.
    Daley, Amanda J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 376
  • [4] Effectiveness of Physical Activity in Primary Prevention of Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Moreno-Peral, Patricia
    Pino-Postigo, Alberto
    Conejo-Ceron, Sonia
    Bellon, Dario
    Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    Bellon, Juan angel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [5] Effectiveness of interventions to promote healthy diet in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Nawaraj Bhattarai
    A Toby Prevost
    Alison J Wright
    Judith Charlton
    Caroline Rudisill
    Martin C Gulliford
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 13
  • [6] Effectiveness of interventions to promote healthy diet in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Bhattarai, Nawaraj
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Wright, Alison J.
    Charlton, Judith
    Rudisill, Caroline
    Gulliford, Martin C.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [7] Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (Reprinted from BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol 344, e1389, 2012)
    Orrow, Gillian
    Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
    Sanderson, Simon
    Sutton, Stephen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (01) : 27 - 27
  • [8] Effectiveness of weight management interventions for adults delivered in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Madigan, Claire D.
    Graham, Henrietta E.
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    Kettle, Victoria E.
    Gokal, Kajal
    Biddle, Greg
    Taylor, Gemma M. J.
    Daley, Amanda J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 377
  • [9] Physical Activity for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Matthewman, Gemma
    Lee, Alexandra
    Kaur, Jaidev G.
    Daley, Amanda J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (12) : 683 - 684
  • [10] Physical activity for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Matthewman, Gemma
    Lee, Alexandra
    Kaur, Jaidev G.
    Daley, Amanda J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (03) : 255 - +