Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians' perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study

被引:30
|
作者
Ong, Jason J. [1 ]
Temple-Smith, Meredith [2 ]
Chen, Marcus [3 ,4 ]
Walker, Sandra [3 ]
Grulich, Andrew [5 ]
Hoy, Jennifer [6 ,7 ]
Fairley, Christopher K. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Gen Practice & Primary Hlth Care Acad Ctr, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[3] Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[5] Univ New S Wales, Kirby Inst, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[6] Alfred Hlth, Dept Infect Dis, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Anal cancer; Screening; HIV; Men who have sex with men; SELF-EXAMINATION; CERVICAL-CANCER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVENTION; DISEASES; PATIENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-015-1430-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. Methods: We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. Results: HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e. g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e. g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. Conclusions: HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians' concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
    Jason J Ong
    Meredith Temple-Smith
    Marcus Chen
    Sandra Walker
    Andrew Grulich
    Jennifer Hoy
    Christopher K Fairley
    BMC Public Health, 15
  • [2] Exploring anal self-examination as a means of screening for anal cancer in HIV positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
    Jason J Ong
    Meredith Temple-Smith
    Marcus Chen
    Sandra Walker
    Andrew Grulich
    Christopher K Fairley
    BMC Public Health, 14
  • [3] Exploring anal self-examination as a means of screening for anal cancer in HIV positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
    Ong, Jason J.
    Temple-Smith, Meredith
    Chen, Marcus
    Walker, Sandra
    Grulich, Andrew
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [4] Anal cancer screening and Pap testing acceptability among HIV-positive men who have sex with men populations
    Kerr, C.
    Heskin, J.
    Moran, B.
    Sadlier, C.
    Bergin, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : E226 - E228
  • [5] Response to 'Anal cancer screening and Pap testing acceptability among HIV-positive men who have sex with men populations'
    Schwierzeck, V.
    Todorova, A.
    Traidl-Hoffmann, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : E225 - E226
  • [6] Anal cytology screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: experience in a city centre HIV clinic
    Goodall, L.
    Clutterbuck, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2012, 23 (09) : 623 - 625
  • [7] Comparison of anal cancer screening strategies including standard anoscopy, anal cytology, and HPV genotyping in HIV-positive men who have sex with men
    Pernot, Simon
    Boucheron, Pauline
    Pere, Helene
    Lucas, Marie-Laure
    Veyer, David
    Fathallah, Nadia
    de Parades, Vincent
    Pavie, Juliette
    Netter, Jeanne
    Collias, Lio
    Taieb, Julien
    Grabar, Sophie
    Weiss, Laurence
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 119 (03) : 381 - 386
  • [8] Comparison of anal cancer screening strategies including standard anoscopy, anal cytology, and HPV genotyping in HIV-positive men who have sex with men
    Simon Pernot
    Pauline Boucheron
    Hélène Péré
    Marie-Laure Lucas
    David Veyer
    Nadia Fathallah
    Vincent de Parades
    Juliette Pavie
    Jeanne Netter
    Lio Collias
    Julien Taieb
    Sophie Grabar
    Laurence Weiss
    British Journal of Cancer, 2018, 119 : 381 - 386
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of screening high-risk HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV-positive women for anal cancer
    Czoski-Murray, C.
    Karnon, J.
    Jones, R.
    Smith, K.
    Kinghorn, G.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 14 (53) : 1 - +
  • [10] Anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men
    Fox, Paul
    CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS, 2009, 4 (01) : 64 - 67