共 23 条
- [1] A Reasonably Reasonable Apprehension of Bias: CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection SYDNEY LAW REVIEW, 2019, 41 (03): : 383 - 395
- [2] MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION V SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 PUBLIC LAW REVIEW, 2019, 30 (03): : 186 - 189
- [3] VARIATION ON A THEME: CPCF V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION [2015] HCA 1 UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW, 2015, 39 (02): : 426 - 433
- [4] JURISDICTIONAL ERROR AND MATERIALITY: HOSSAIN V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION (2018) 359 ALR 1; [2018] HCA 34 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2019, 26 (02): : 52 - 57
- [5] MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION v EGAN [2018] FCAFC 169 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2018, 25 (04): : 204 - 206
- [6] PLAINTIFF M174/2016 V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION (2018) 92 ALJR 481; [2018] HCA 16 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2018, 25 (03): : 154 - 154
- [7] MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION v WZARH (2015) 326 ALR 1 ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW, 2016, 37 (01): : 295 - 303
- [8] PLAINTIFF M68/2015 V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2016, 23 (04): : 196 - 200
- [9] MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION v LE (2016) 244 FCR 56 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2018, 24 (04): : 216 - 221
- [10] MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION v TESIC (2017) 251 FCR 23 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2018, 24 (04): : 214 - 216