AN IMPORTANT MILGRAM-HOLOCAUST LINKAGE: FORMAL RATIONALITY

被引:1
|
作者
Russell, Nestar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Sociol, Sessionally, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Formal rationality; Holocaust; Obedience; Milgram; Weber; Ritzer; OBEDIENCE; MURDER;
D O I
10.29173/cjs28291
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
After Stanley Milgram published his Obedience to Authority baseline experiment, some scholars drew parallels between his findings and the Holocaust-the so-called Milgram-Holocaust linkage. However, because Milgram's research has been shown to differ in many ways from the Holocaust's finer historical details, recent literature has challenged the linkage. This article argues that the Obedience studies and the Holocaust share two commonalities that are so significant that they may negate the importance others have attributed to the differences. These commonalities are (1) an end-goal of maximising "ordinary" people's participation in harm infliction and (2) a reliance on formally rational techniques of discovery to achieve this end-goal. Using archival documents, this article reveals the learning processes Milgram utilised during his pilot studies in order to maximise ordinary people's completion of the baseline experiment. This article then illustrates how certain Nazis relied on the same techniques of discovery during the invention of the Holocaust. In effect, during the Obedience studies and the Holocaust processes were developed that made, in each case, the undoable doable.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 292
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE MILGRAM-HOLOCAUST LINKAGE: CHALLENGING THE PRESENT CONSENSUS
    Russell, Nestar
    Gregory, Robert
    [J]. STATE CRIME, 2015, 4 (02): : 128 - 153
  • [2] Making the undoable doable - Milgram, the Holocaust, and modern government
    Russell, N
    Gregory, R
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 35 (04): : 327 - 349
  • [3] A Coq Formal Proof of the Lax-Milgram Theorem
    Boldo, Sylvie
    Clement, Francois
    Faissole, Florian
    Martin, Vincent
    Mayero, Micaela
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE ON CERTIFIED PROGRAMS AND PROOFS, CPP'17, 2017, : 79 - 89
  • [4] SCIENTIFIC RATIONALITY, FORMAL OR INFORMAL
    JIANG, TJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1985, 36 (04): : 409 - 423
  • [5] THE FORMAL STRUCTURE OF PRACTICAL RATIONALITY
    Palop, Lydia de Tienda
    [J]. PENSAMIENTO, 2021, 77 (295): : 491 - 500
  • [6] RATIONALITY, IDEOLOGY, VIOLENCE. MARCUSE AND THE HOLOCAUST
    Ghita, Izabella
    [J]. ANALELE UNIVERSITATII BUCURESTI-FILOSOFIE-ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST-PHILOSOPHY, 2005, 54 (01): : 145 - 153
  • [7] MORALITY AND IDEAL OF RATIONALITY IN FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS
    LADD, J
    [J]. MONIST, 1970, 54 (04): : 488 - 516
  • [8] The Correspondence Principle, Formal Analogy, and Scientific Rationality
    Lee, Jeongmin
    [J]. Philosophy and Cognitive Science II: Western & Eastern Studies, 2015, 20 : 177 - 192
  • [9] Authorities and Uncertainties: Applying Lessons from the Study of Jewish Resistance during the Holocaust to the Milgram Legacy
    Einwohner, Rachel L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2014, 70 (03) : 531 - 543
  • [10] Why exactly is commitment important for rationality?
    Sen, A
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2005, 21 (01) : 5 - 14