Sample size and power determination in joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data

被引:40
|
作者
Chen, Liddy M. [1 ]
Ibrahim, Joseph G. [1 ]
Chu, Haitao [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
sample size; power determination; joint modeling; survival analysis; longitudinal data; repeated measurements; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TO-EVENT DATA; UNOBSERVED HETEROGENEITY; LIKELIHOOD APPROACH; REGRESSION-MODEL; CANCER; ERROR;
D O I
10.1002/sim.4263
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Owing to the rapid development of biomarkers in clinical trials, joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data has gained its popularity in the recent years because it reduces bias and provides improvements of efficiency in the assessment of treatment effects and other prognostic factors. Although much effort has been put into inferential methods in joint modeling, such as estimation and hypothesis testing, design aspects have not been formally considered. Statistical design, such as sample size and power calculations, is a crucial first step in clinical trials. In this paper, we derive a closed-form sample size formula for estimating the effect of the longitudinal process in joint modeling, and extend Schoenfeld's sample size formula to the joint modeling setting for estimating the overall treatment effect. The sample size formula we develop is quite general, allowing for p-degree polynomial trajectories. The robustness of our model is demonstrated in simulation studies with linear and quadratic trajectories. We discuss the impact of the within-subject variability on power and data collection strategies, such as spacing and frequency of repeated measurements, in order to maximize the power. When the within-subject variability is large, different data collection strategies can influence the power of the study in a significant way. Optimal frequency of repeated measurements also depends on the nature of the trajectory with higher polynomial trajectories and larger measurement error requiring more frequent measurements. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2295 / 2309
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Abrams, Keith R.
    Lambert, Paul C.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01): : 165 - 184
  • [2] Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Imaging and Survival Data
    Kang, Kai
    Song, Xin Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 32 (02) : 402 - 412
  • [3] Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data
    Haitao Pan
    Suyu Liu
    Danmin Miao
    Ying Yuan
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [4] Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis
    Lu, Kaifeng
    Mehrotra, Devan V.
    Liu, Guanghan
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (04) : 679 - 699
  • [5] Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data
    Pan, Haitao
    Liu, Suyu
    Miao, Danmin
    Yuan, Ying
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [6] Joint modeling of longitudinal and cure-survival data
    Kim S.
    Zeng D.
    Li Y.
    Spiegelman D.
    [J]. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 2013, 7 (2) : 324 - 344
  • [7] An efficient estimation approach to joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data
    Krahn, Jody
    Hossain, Shakhawat
    Khan, Shahedul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2023, 50 (15) : 3031 - 3047
  • [8] Joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data: Likelihood approach revisited
    Hsieh, Fushing
    Tseng, Yi-Kuan
    Wang, Jane-Ling
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (04) : 1037 - 1043
  • [9] Bayesian joint modeling of longitudinal and spatial survival AIDS data
    Martins, Rui
    Silva, Giovani L.
    Andreozzi, Valeska
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (19) : 3368 - 3384
  • [10] Joint modeling of quantitative longitudinal data and censored survival time
    Jacqmin-Gadda, H
    Thiébaut, R
    Dartigues, JF
    [J]. REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2004, 52 (06): : 502 - 510