A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport

被引:277
|
作者
Kamargianni, Maria [1 ]
Li, Weibo [1 ]
Matyas, Melinda [1 ]
Schafer, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, Cent House,14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Mobility as a Service; new mobility concepts; mobility integration; index; PUBLIC TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The growing pressure on urban passenger transport systems has increased the demand for new and innovative solutions to increase its efficiency. One approach to tackle this challenge has been the slow but steady shift towards shared mobility services (car-, bike-sharing etc.). Building on these new modes and the developments in information and communication technologies, the concept of "Mobility as a Service" (MaaS) has recently come to light and offers convenient door-to-door transport without the need to own a private vehicle. The term Mobility as a Service (MaaS) stands for buying mobility services based on consumer needs instead of buying the means of mobility. In recent years, various MaaS schemes have been arisen around the world. The objective of this paper is to review these newly existing mobility services and develop an index to evaluate the level of mobility integration for each based on the assumption that higher level of integration is more appealing to travellers. The review presented in this paper allows a comparison among the schemes and provides the background and the key points of MaaS systems that the research community could use for designing surveys. It also provides significant insights to transport operators and authorities on the elements they should take into account to apply an attractive MaaS scheme that could effectively shift demand away from private vehicles. (C) 2016 Published Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:3294 / 3303
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact Assessments of New Mobility Services: A Critical Review
    Storme, Tom
    Casier, Corneel
    Azadi, Hossein
    Witlox, Frank
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [2] NEW TRANSPORT AND URBAN MOBILITY
    Davila, Julio D.
    [J]. BITACORA URBANO TERRITORIAL, 2012, 21 (02): : 58 - 60
  • [3] Urban mobility and public transport: future perspectives and review
    Ceder, Avishai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (04) : 455 - 479
  • [4] Transport policy in response to automation and new mobility services
    Emberger, Guenter
    Shibayama, Takeru
    May, Anthony D.
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 98 : 55 - 56
  • [5] MOBILITY STYLES AND AFFINITY FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES IN ROMANIAN URBAN AREAS
    Tosa, Cristian
    Mitrea, Andrei
    Miwa, Tomio
    Morikawa, Takayuki
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [6] PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL TRANSPORT SERVICES ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL URBAN MOBILITY ACT
    Rosilho, Andre
    Sundfeld, Carlos Ari
    [J]. REVISTA DE DIREITO DA CIDADE-CITY LAW, 2018, 10 (02): : 971 - 987
  • [7] Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review
    Croci, Edoardo
    Lucchitta, Benedetta
    Penati, Tommaso
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 16
  • [8] The Uses of Personalized Transport Services: New Routines for Sustainable Mobility?
    Frere, Severine
    Mathon, Sylvie
    Castex, Elodie
    [J]. ESPACES-POPULATIONS-SOCIETES, 2015, (1-2):
  • [9] Concept of interlinking mobility services for urban transport towards intermodal mobility including private and shared electromobility
    Breuer, Daniel
    Spichartz, Philipp
    Sourkounis, Constantinos
    [J]. 2019 FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGIES (EVER), 2019,
  • [10] A scoping review on the conceptualisation and impacts of new mobility services
    Mubiru, Ibrahim
    Westerholt, Rene
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2024, 16 (01)