Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials

被引:1
|
作者
Lofgren, Sarah M. [1 ]
Okafor, Elizabeth C. [2 ]
Colette, Alanna A. [3 ]
Pastick, Katelyn A. [2 ]
Skipper, Caleb P. [1 ]
Pullen, Matthew F. [1 ]
Nicol, Melanie R. [5 ]
Bold, Tyler D. [1 ]
Bangdiwala, Ananta S. [3 ]
Engen, Nicole W. [3 ]
Collins, Lindsey B. [5 ]
Williams, Darlisha A. [1 ]
Axelrod, Margaret L. [6 ]
Thielen, Beth K. [4 ]
Hullsiek, Kathy H. [3 ]
Boulware, David R. [1 ]
Rajasingham, Radha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis & Int Med, Box 736 UMHC, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Infect Dis, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Expt & Clin Pharmacol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2021年 / 8卷 / 11期
关键词
antibody; COVID-19; humoral immunity; SARS-CoV-2; serology;
D O I
10.1093/ofid/ofab506
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing in outpatients to assess seropositivity. Methods In 2020, we conducted 3 internet-based randomized clinical trials and offered serologic testing via self-collected DBS as a voluntary substudy. COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition with epidemiological link to cases. A minority reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at an outside facility. We tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin via antibody detection by agglutination-PCR (ADAP) and compared the results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results Of 2727 participants in the primary studies, 60% (1648/2727) consented for serology testing; 56% (931/1648) returned a usable DBS sample. Of those who were asymptomatic, 5% (33/707) had positive ADAP serology. Of participants with a positive PCR, 67% (36/54) had positive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. None of those who were PCR-positive and asymptomatic were seropositive (0/7). Of 77 specimens tested for concordance via ELISA, 83% (64/77) were concordant. The challenges of completing a remote testing program during a pandemic included sourcing and assembling collection kits, delivery and return of the kits, and troubleshooting testing. Self-collection was successful for >95% of participants. Delays in US mail with possible sample degradation and timing of DBS collection complicated the analysis. Conclusions We found remote antibody testing during a global pandemic feasible although challenging. We identified an association between symptomatic COVID-19 and positive antibody results at a similar prevalence as other outpatient cohorts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SARS-CoV-2 Testing Trials and Tribulations
    Babiker, Ahmed
    Myers, Charlie W.
    Hill, Charles E.
    Guarner, Jeannette
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 153 (06) : 706 - 708
  • [2] The Role of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Is There One?
    Theel, Elitza S.
    Slev, Patricia
    Wheeler, Sarah
    Couturier, Marc Roger
    Wong, Susan J.
    Kadkhoda, Kamran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [3] SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing-questions to be asked
    Oezcueruemez, Mustafa K.
    Ambrosch, Andreas
    Frey, Oliver
    Haselmann, Verena
    Holdenrieder, Stefan
    Kiehntopf, Michael
    Neumaier, Michael
    Walter, Michael
    Wenzel, Folker
    Woelfel, Roman
    Renz, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 146 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [4] The Flawed Science of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Immunity
    Abbasi, Jennifer
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (18): : 1781 - 1781
  • [5] To Transfuse or Not to Transfuse: Sars-Cov-2 Donor Antibody Testing
    Meyer, Erin Goodhue
    Lasky, Baia J.
    Hall, Julie
    Williamson, Phillip C.
    Busch, Michael P.
    Young, Pampee P.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2020, 60 : 108A - 108A
  • [6] SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing: Where Are We Now?
    Smerczak, Elizabeth
    [J]. LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (02) : E19 - E29
  • [7] Assessment of the feasibility of pool testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection screening
    Paganini, Irene
    Sani, Cristina
    Chilleri, Chiara
    Baccini, Michela
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Bisanzi, Simonetta
    Burroni, Elena
    Cellai, Filippo
    Coppi, Marco
    Mealli, Fabrizia
    Pompeo, Giampaolo
    Viti, Jessica
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    Carozzi, Francesca M.
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 54 (07) : 478 - 487
  • [8] Significance of IgA antibody testing for early detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Wang, Pei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (04) : 1888 - 1889
  • [9] The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Testing on Monoclonal Antibody Allocation
    Lawong, A.
    SoRelle, J.
    Zhang, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (11): : S67 - S68
  • [10] SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody testing for an entire rural community: methods and feasibility of high-throughput testing procedures
    Ayesha Appa
    Gabriel Chamie
    Aenor Sawyer
    Kimberly Baltzell
    Kathryn Dippell
    Salu Ribeiro
    Elias Duarte
    Joanna Vinden
    CLIAHUB Consortium
    Jonathan Kramer-Feldman
    Shahryar Rahdari
    Doug MacIntosh
    Katherine Nicholson
    Jonathan Im
    Diane Havlir
    Bryan Greenhouse
    [J]. Archives of Public Health, 79