Comparative Outcome of Hybrid External Fixator Versus Primary Ilizarov Fixator in the Treatment of Open Distal Tibia Extra-Articular Fractures

Introduction Because one-third of the tibia is subcutaneous throughout most of its length and its location, it is more prone to open fractures. Open distal tibia fractures are mostly due to RTA and sports injuries. The goal of treatment is to obtain a healed, well-aligned fracture; pain-free weight-bearing; and functional range of motion of the knee and ankle. Materials and Methods 33 patients of the 18-60-year age group with open distal tibia extra-articular fractures (without vascular injury), less than 3 weeks old trauma were included in the prospective study for 1 year period (1st June 2019 to 31st May 2020). 17 cases were treated with the Hybrid external fixator (HEF) and 16 cases were treated with the Ilizarov fixator (IF). Results Significantly (P < 0.05), the mean duration of surgery was less in the HEF group (67.6 min), faster union of open type-II fractures in the HEF group (16.4 weeks), and also a higher AOFAS score at 6 months in open type-II fractures in the HEF group (84.4). There were two cases of equinus deformity in the IF group and one case of valgus deformity in the HEF group. Conclusion HEF and IF are both equally effective in the treatment of open distal tibia extra-articular fractures with the advantage of stable fracture fixation, early weight-bearing, preserving soft tissue, minimal periosteal stripping, and providing one-staged definitive intervention. However, HEF is preferred over IF in terms of less operating time, faster union, and a better functional outcome with minimal complications.