NACT plus IMRT versus NACT plus IMRT plus CCRT in locoregionally advanced NPC patients: a retrospective study

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Xialin [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Xiang [3 ]
Wang, Jianfang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jianjiang [1 ,2 ]
Ji, Rong [4 ]
机构
[1] Shaoxing Peoples Hosp, Dept Oncol, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Oncol, Shaoxing Hosp, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Shaoxing Second Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 123 Yanan Rd, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY | 2019年 / 12卷
关键词
advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma; intensity modulated radiotherapy; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ADVANCED NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; CONCURRENT CISPLATIN-RADIOTHERAPY; PHASE-II TRIAL; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DISTANT METASTASIS; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.2147/OTT.S183483
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose: The outcomes and safety profiles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) + intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or NACT + IMRT + concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients and methods: Between 2010 and 2014, 125 patients with stage III-IVb NPC, who were treated with IMRT (36, 28.8%) or IMRT + CCRT (89, 71.2%) following NACT, participated in the research. There were grade 3-4 toxicities during NACT or radiotherapy (RT) in NACT + IMRT group and NACT + IMRT + CCRT group. Results: MRI within 3 months demonstrated that no patient suffered with progressive disease, 116 patients (92.8%) achieved a response rate (RR) with the complete response (CR) rate of 70.4% (88/125) and partial response (PR) rate of 22.4% (28/125), and nine patients (7.2%) showed stable disease (SD) at the primary site and metastatic nodes. Compared with NACT + IMRT group, patients in NACT + IMRT + CCRT group did not show significantly better RR (93.3% vs 91.7%, P=1.00), CR rate (71.9% vs 66.7%, P=0.67), or PR rate (21.4% vs 25%, P=0.81). There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS, P=0.114), local relapse-free survival (LRFS, P=0.124), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, P=0.668) or progression-free survival (PFS, P=0.475) between NACT + IMRT group and NACT + IMRT + CCRT group. T classification (P=0.042) and N classification (P=0.021) were independent prognostic factors for DMFS. Conclusion: To sum up, no significant difference was observed in combined RR, CR rate, LRFS, DMFS, PFS, or OS between the two groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1553 / 1562
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
    Wei, Zhigong
    Zhang, Zhengfang
    Luo, Jingwen
    Li, Nan
    Peng, Xingchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 145 (07) : 1857 - 1864
  • [2] Induction Chemotherapy Plus IMRT-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Induction Chemotherapy Plus IMRT Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Wei, Z.
    Zhang, Z.
    Li, P.
    Peng, X.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E310 - E310
  • [3] Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhigong Wei
    Zhengfang Zhang
    Jingwen Luo
    Nan Li
    Xingchen Peng
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2019, 145 : 1857 - 1864
  • [4] Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus IMRT Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Matched Study
    OuYang, Pu-Yun
    Bi, Zhuo-Fei
    Zhang, Lu-Ning
    You, Kai-Yun
    Xiao, Yao
    Lan, Xiao-Wen
    Tang, Jie
    Wang, Xi-Cheng
    Deng, Wuguo
    Xie, Fang-Yun
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 9 (04): : 329 - 335
  • [5] NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS CHEMORADIATION (NACT-CCRT) VERSUS CHEMORADIATION PLUS ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY (CCRT-ACT) FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER: 3-YEAR RESULTS FROM A RANDOMISED TRIAL
    Chakrabandhu, S.
    Chitapanarux, I.
    Onchan, W.
    Klunklin, P.
    Supawongwattana, B.
    Tharavichitkul, E.
    Lorvidhaya, V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 : E2 - E2
  • [6] Phase I/II Study of SMART-IMRT Plus Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Fan, T.
    Li, J.
    Liu, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S477 - S478
  • [7] A Bayesian network meta-analysis of the primary definitive therapies for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: IC plus CCRT, CCRT plus AC, and CCRT alone
    Zhang, Zhan-Jie
    Shi, Liang-Liang
    Hong, Xiao-Hua
    Xiao, Bo-Ya
    Lin, Guo-He
    Liu, Quentin
    Wang, Bi-Cheng
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [8] Evaluation of late sequelae in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients after NACT and IMRT
    Chhabra, Raja
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 192 : S66 - S67
  • [9] Long-term result of a multicenter clinical study of cetuximab combined with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
    Chen, Chun-yan
    Zhao, Chong
    Gao, Li
    Lang, Jin-yi
    Pan, Jian-ji
    Hu, Chao-su
    Jin, Feng
    Wang, Ren-sheng
    Xie, Conghua
    Lin, Tongyu
    Lu, Tai-xiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [10] PHASE ?/II STUDY OF SMART-IMRT PLUS CISPLATIN AND 5-FU CHEMOTHERAPY IN LOCOREGIONALLY ADVANCED NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER
    Tingyong, F.
    Li, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S325 - S325