Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians

被引:26
|
作者
Nicholson, Joey [1 ]
McCrillis, Aileen [2 ]
Williams, Jeff D. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Hlth Sci Lib, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Hlth Sci Lib, User Serv, New York, NY USA
关键词
QUALITY;
D O I
10.5195/jmla.2017.176
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Objective: While many librarians have been asked to participate in systematic reviews with researchers, often these researchers are not familiar with the systematic review process or the appropriate role for librarians. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges and barriers that librarians face when collaborating on systematic reviews. To take a wider view of the whole process of collaborating on systematic reviews, the authors deliberately focused on interpersonal and methodological issues other than searching itself. Methods: To characterize the biggest challenges that librarians face while collaborating on systematic review projects, we used a web-based survey. The thirteen-item survey included seventeen challenges grouped into two categories: methodological and interpersonal. Participants were required to indicate the frequency and difficulty of the challenges listed. Open-ended questions allowed survey participants to describe challenges not listed in the survey and to describe strategies used to overcome challenges. Results: Of the 17 challenges listed in the survey, 8 were reported as common by over 40% of respondents. These included methodological issues around having too broad or narrow research questions, lacking eligibility criteria, having unclear research questions, and not following established methods. The remaining challenges were interpersonal, including issues around student-led projects and the size of the research team. Of the top 8 most frequent challenges, 5 were also ranked as most difficult to handle. Open-ended responses underscored many of the challenges included in the survey and revealed several additional challenges. Conclusions: These results suggest that the most frequent and challenging issues relate to development of the research question and general communication with team members. Clear protocols for collaboration on systematic reviews, as well as a culture of mentorship, can help librarians prevent and address these challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 393
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews
    Murphy, Susan A.
    Boden, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2015, 103 (02) : 73 - 78
  • [2] A survey of librarians with a health sciences background
    Raszewski, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2011, 99 (04) : 304 - 306
  • [3] Exploring interprofessional collaboration and attitudes of health sciences librarians
    Hinrichs, Rachel J.
    Bakker, Caitlin J.
    Brigham, Tara J.
    Ginier, Emily C.
    Stevens, Gregg A.
    Alpi, Kristine M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2020, 108 (03) : 440 - 451
  • [4] Assessing the roles and challenges of librarians in dental systematic and scoping reviews
    Schvaneveldt, Nena
    Stellrecht, Elizabeth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2021, 109 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [5] Systematic reviews and librarians
    McKibbon, K. Ann
    [J]. LIBRARY TRENDS, 2006, 55 (01) : 202 - 215
  • [6] THE EVALUATION OF BIOMEDICAL BOOK REVIEWS BY ACADEMIC HEALTH-SCIENCES LIBRARIANS
    MARTIN, LM
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 1986, 74 (02): : 157 - 160
  • [7] Subject knowledge in the health sciences library: an online survey of Canadian academic health sciences librarians
    Watson, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2005, 93 (04) : 459 - 466
  • [8] Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
    Holly K. Grossetta Nardini
    Janene Batten
    Melissa C. Funaro
    Rolando Garcia-Milian
    Kate Nyhan
    Judy M. Spak
    Lei Wang
    Janis G. Glover
    [J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4
  • [9] Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
    Nardini, Holly K. Grossetta
    Batten, Janene
    Funaro, Melissa C.
    Garcia-Milian, Rolando
    Nyhan, Kate
    Spak, Judy M.
    Wang, Lei
    Glover, Janis G.
    [J]. RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [10] Librarians as reviewers of the methodology of systematic reviews. Results of an online survey
    Billot, Stephanie
    Gary, Mireille
    [J]. ENVIRONNEMENT RISQUES & SANTE, 2020, 19 (01): : 65 - 66