Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use or improve outcome

被引:21
|
作者
Bond, GR [1 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Drug & Poison Informat Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ipecac; decontamination; poisoning; ingestion; poison center;
D O I
10.1542/peds.112.5.1061
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background. The usefulness of syrup of ipecac as a home treatment for poisoning and the need to keep it in the home has been increasingly challenged. Many poison centers do not recommend any use of syrup of ipecac. Objective. To determine if use of syrup of ipecac in children at home is associated with reduced utilization of emergency department (ED) resources or improved outcome after unintended exposure to a pharmaceutical. Design. Cohort comparison. Setting. American Association of Poison Control Centers' Toxic Exposure Surveillance System Database. Patients. Blinded data for each of the 64 US poison centers included ED referral recommendation rate, actual rate of ED use, actual home use of syrup of ipecac, and outcome. These data were derived from cases in 2000 and 2001 involving children <6 years of age who unintentionally ingested a pharmaceutical agent and in which the call to a poison center came from home (752602 children). Outcome Measures. Correlation between rate of home use of syrup of ipecac and rate of recommendation for ED referral was the primary outcome sought. Rate of adverse outcome was also compared. In addition, the actual ED use and home syrup of ipecac utilization rates at 7 specific centers were identified and compared with the published rates from these same centers from 1990 data to look for the trend in practice for this subgroup. Results. Mean rate of referral to ED was 9% (range: 3%-18%). Mean home use of syrup of ipecac was 1.8% (range: 0.2%-14%). Increased home use of syrup of ipecac was not associated with referral to ED (r=0.18; 95% confidence interval of r=-0.06-0.41). Adverse outcome was rare: 0.6% (range: 0.2%-2.1%). There was no difference in referral rate or adverse outcome rate between 2 groups of 32 centers divided by relative syrup of ipecac use. In the 7 centers, ED use decreased from a mean of 13.5% in 1990 to a mean of 8.1% in 2000-2001. Ipecac use decreased from a mean of 9.6% to 2.1%. Conclusions. This study suggests there is no reduction in resource utilization or improvement in patient outcome from the use of syrup of ipecac at home. Although these data cannot exclude a benefit in a very limited set of poisonings, any benefit remains to be proven.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1064
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use
    Bond, GR
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 217A - 217A
  • [3] USE OF IPECAC SYRUP IN TOXICOLOGY
    ROUZIOUX, JM
    DUCLUZEAU, R
    SAUDIN, F
    [J]. JOURNAL DE TOXICOLOGIE MEDICALE, 1981, 1 (01): : 53 - 54
  • [4] Evaluation of the time frame for home ipecac syrup use when not kept in the home
    Garrison, J
    Shepherd, G
    Huddleston, WL
    Watson, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 41 (03): : 217 - 221
  • [5] SYRUP OF IPECAC - ITS COMMUNITY USE
    PEMBLE, S
    BOBBINK, S
    HOFFMAN, R
    PALMER, D
    ROBERTSON, WO
    [J]. VETERINARY AND HUMAN TOXICOLOGY, 1980, 22 (05) : 358 - 358
  • [6] SYRUP OF IPECAC - ITS COMMUNITY USE
    PEMBLE, S
    BOBBINK, S
    HOFFMAN, R
    PALMER, D
    ROBERTSON, WO
    [J]. VETERINARY AND HUMAN TOXICOLOGY, 1980, 22 : 22 - 23
  • [7] IPECAC USE IN THE HOME
    RUMACK, BH
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1985, 75 (06) : 1148 - 1148
  • [8] Does Physician Use of Scripting in the Emergency Department Improve Patient Satisfaction?
    Matloff, L.
    Stone, C.
    Morgan, D.
    Drigalla, D.
    Burr, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 52 (04) : S81 - S82
  • [9] IPECAC SYRUP . ITS USE AS AN EMETIC IN POISON CONTROL
    SHIRKEY, HC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1966, 69 (01): : 139 - +
  • [10] Ipecac Syrup: Its Use as an Emetic in Poison Control
    Lopez-Jaimez, Gabriela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 174 : 159 - +