The antecedents of 'sovereignty as responsibility'

被引:36
|
作者
Glanville, Luke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Asia Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Ctr Governance & Publ Policy, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
constructivism; international history; non-intervention; responsibility to protect; sovereignty; HUMAN-RIGHTS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; SELF-DETERMINATION; STATE; STANDARD; ANARCHY; NATION;
D O I
10.1177/1354066109346889
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Notions of 'sovereignty as responsibility' and 'the responsibility to protect' are often framed as radical departures from the 'traditional' conception of sovereignty. Many assume that sovereignty has, until recently, entailed only rights and not responsibilities. In contrast, this article argues that sovereign authority has been understood to involve varied and evolving responsibilities since it was first articulated in the 16th and 17th centuries. It then traces the historical emergence of the tension between the right of sovereign states to be self-governing and free from outside interference and their responsibility to secure the safety of their populations. It cautions against a simplified story of 'traditional' sovereignty which reifies supposedly concrete and ahistorical rights of sovereigns while casting sovereign responsibilities as a morally abstract and late-arriving challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 255
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条